User talk:Ezavian

Hello, Ezavian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Simplified Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! User:Beatley (talk) 23:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ellen Zavian has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ellen Zavian. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 21:43, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My work has been deleted and the person that deleted it said only 'admin' can undelete. How do I get a hold of them? Ezavian (talk) 19:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ellen Zavian (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Riteboke was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ellen Zavian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ellen Zavian, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Riteboke (talk) 08:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ezavian! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Riteboke (talk) 08:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ellen Zavian (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs to be trimmed down. Much of the content is still unsourced so those statements need to be sourced or removed. Also, some of the sources do not make mention of Zavian so those sources should be removed along with the related content. These are typical symptoms of an autobiography which is why it is generally a bad idea. If resubmitted again without significant improvement, it is likely to be rejected meaning it will no longer be considered.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ellen Zavian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ellen Zavian, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have been working on this for a while and I am a student. This was deleted in error. Please undelete. All my hard work gone. Ezavian (talk) 19:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted because it had not been edited for 6 months. Creating an autobiography is the most difficult task on Wikipedia, so difficult that in all my many years here, I have rarely seen it achieved. Theroadislong (talk) 19:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am a student so it was not an autobiography. I am busy with school, so don't have a great deal of time during the semester to work with. Please undelete! All my hard work gone. Ezavian (talk) 19:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an admin so cannot undelete your draft. Theroadislong (talk) 19:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So, you can delete at random but cannot undelete? Ezavian (talk) 19:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the ADMIN button? Ezavian (talk) 19:58, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have not deleted anything, you have already requested that your draft be undeleted, an admin will consider that at some point. Theroadislong (talk) 20:00, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Ezavian", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because you have implied that you are not Ellen Zavian - the subject of your writing - but your username "Ezavian" implies that you are. Please note that you should not use a username that implies that you are a real, identifiable person when you are, in reality, not that person. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have you also edited using the name User:Ellen Zavian? Theroadislong (talk) 22:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ezavian, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Ellen Zavian (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]