User talk:Focton

Welcome!

Hello, Focton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! McSly (talk) 13:44, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Orgone and Template:Alternative medicine sidebar. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 14:55, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Orgone, you may be blocked from editing. Roxy the elfin dog . wooF 15:27, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help about editing Orgone article

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Hello, I am trying to edit the information about Orgone as it is characterized as pseudoscience which is not. In my Edit Statement while trying to edit the article I typed the following: According to the two books of Wilhelm Reich about the discovery of Orgone, The Function of the Orgasm: Sex-Economic Problems of Biological Energy (The Discovery of the Orgone, Vol. 1) and The Cancer Biopathy (The Discovery of Orgone, Vol. 2) there are evidences included such as calculations, photos and other various results like the thermal anomaly recorded in the Orgone energy accumulator. So the references stating that Orgone is pseudoscience are false. So I would like to remove them.

I have read both books and they are cosistant, full of evidences and proofs that Orgone exists. Also I have read the Cosmic Superimposition by Wilhelm Reich and wanted to mention in the Edit Statement that there are many citations in Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine accepting and supporting the Orgone, but I could not type the last ones as there is a character letter limit. Focton (talk) 16:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to duplicate here what you asked on the article talk page Talk:Orgone#Corrections in Orgone article already. I replied overthere. Good luck. - DVdm (talk) 16:33, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:52, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:59, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article in question is Orgone. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 18:00, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Focton, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Focton! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Dispilio Tablet into Proto-writing. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]