User talk:FranklinA47

June 2022

Hello, I'm AllyD. I noticed that you recently removed content from Joseph Sigelman without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AllyD (talk) 10:59, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kate McDonnell has been accepted

Kate McDonnell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 18:32, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fvckrender moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fvckrender, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello FranklinA47. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:FranklinA47. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=FranklinA47|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being paid or have been paid for any contributions to Wikipedia. If I was, according to the rules which I went through and understood about creating and editing articles, I would use the template or select the I am paid to edit button when using the creation wizard or use the template as instructed above. FranklinA47 (talk) 20:53, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ronnie K. Pirovino moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ronnie K. Pirovino, is not suitable as written to remain published. There appears to be either a WP:UPE or WP:COI issue. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where it can remain while you address the UPE/COI concern. When you have made the necessary steps regarding COI/UPE, and the article meets WP:GNG and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Do not re-add to mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:12, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will improve the article and submit the draft for review. Thank you for informing me. FranklinA47 (talk) 01:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
4	John Prip (talk)	Add sources
1,037	National Security Guard (talk)	Add sources
22	Frederick Cooper (historian) (talk)	Add sources
65	Ravishankar Shukla (talk)	Add sources
4	Alice Kagawa Parrott (talk)	Add sources
181	Prostaglandin E1 (talk)	Add sources
32	Thakur Kesari Singh Barhath (talk)	Cleanup
8	Dan Dailey (glass artist) (talk)	Cleanup
374	Revolutionary movement for Indian independence (talk)	Cleanup
8,609	COVID-19 (talk)	Expand
490	Pell Grant (talk)	Expand
39	Hanoi Capital Region (talk)	Expand
893	All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,320	Unitary parliamentary republic (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
64	Swedish government response to the COVID-19 pandemic (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
102	Ayya Vaikundar (talk)	Merge
360	Mahāvākyas (talk)	Merge
20	Tuberolachnus salignus (talk)	Merge
6	Roger Richthoff (talk)	Wikify
15	Prem Krishna Khanna (talk)	Wikify
37	Sanjeev Singh (talk)	Wikify
72	Razel Street (talk)	Orphan
2	Hans Holtzbecher (talk)	Orphan
1	Matthew T. Newsom (talk)	Orphan
19	Sanjay Singh Gangwar (talk)	Stub
4	Ulrika Heie (talk)	Stub
76	Talant Mamytov (talk)	Stub
5	Joseph S. Coselli (talk)	Stub
27	Annika Hirvonen (talk)	Stub
126	Naujawan Bharat Sabha (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:46, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Blockchain-based Service Network (BSN) (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

(a) most of the references are not reliable (b) much of the text is puffery (c) some of the claims appear to be self-contradictory.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Blockchain-based Service Network (BSN) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 09:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FranklinA47! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 09:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

GeneralNotability (talk) 01:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Against the Grain Theatre moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Against the Grain Theatre, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 05:20, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was not paid and have not ever been paid to make any edits on Wikipedia. You approved the draft yourself; now it is not ready for mainspace.

onel5969 I also cannot submit the draft for review; I have been blocked from editing on Wikipedia. FranklinA47 (talk) 08:09, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FranklinA47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read and understood the Terms of Use and the paid editing disclosure.

I was not paid and have not ever been paid to make any edits on Wikipedia.

I will not edit any topics without permission; just let me know what to edit.

I live and study in Nigeria, so aside from classes and work, I use my free time to edit Wikipedia at a cybercafé, so when I am online, I most want to finish the pages that I created or started. If you check the log, I sometimes go months without making an edit, and every time I am attached to a payment, which I am not receiving.

Take, for instance, You start working on a school project because you saw on a student bulletin board that it was free for anyone who wanted to participate, and you have seniors that will guide you during the process. You excitedly decided to join, started topics, and made random edits as your contribution to that project. There have been some ups and downs, but you decided to continue learning more about the rules for the project while contributing to it. One day, like every other day, you wake up and read an email you received from the school board saying you have been expelled from the school for the reason that you have been receiving payments from the teachers and other schools to contribute to that same project (which you decided to work on because it was free to all) and all your contributions, research, and all other work for that project have been deleted.

It must be an encouraging and good feeling. FranklinA47 (talk) 08:47, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't have access to the information that the blocking admin has, but even just based on your edits it's pretty obvious that you aren't picking the topics you are editing about at random. Note that you do not have to be specifically paid for edits to be a paid editor, any paid relationship whatsoever triggers the disclosure requirement. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FranklinA47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read and understood the Terms of Use and the paid editing disclosure. *I admit that the nature of my edits triggered the disclosure requirements. *Moving forward I would like to join a trainee program or be mentored by a more experienced editor (if there are any of these types of programs available), so I can learn how to contribute properly and not make the same mistakes on this platform. FranklinA47 (talk) 19:37, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You still have not disclosed your conflict of interest/paid editing status, nor have you told us what you plan to write about instead. Yamla (talk) 19:52, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FranklinA47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read and understood the Terms of Use and the paid editing disclosure.

I admit that the nature of my edits triggered the disclosure requirements. I have never been paid to edit Wikipedia. I once met Joey Primani.

If my unblock request is approved, I would love to work on or write about war, computing, movies, and gaming articles.

Moving forward, I would like to join a trainee program or be mentored by a more experienced editor (if there are any of these types of programs available), so I can learn how to contribute properly and not make the same mistakes on this platform. FranklinA47 (talk) 21:36, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on off-wiki evidence and on-wiki behaviour, it strikes me as very unlikely that you have never been paid to edit. --Blablubbs (talk) 17:55, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blablubbs I think I am being mistaken for someone else. Off-Wiki evidence?-FranklinA47 (talk) 21:45, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is a VRT ticket in your block reason. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:43, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederic Duquette (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Raydann was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frederic Duquette and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 17:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joey Primiani

Hello, FranklinA47. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joey Primiani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ronnie K. Pirovino (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No trace of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ronnie K. Pirovino and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 23:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joey Primiani

Hello, FranklinA47. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Joey Primiani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Frederic Duquette

Hello, FranklinA47. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Frederic Duquette".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ronnie K. Pirovino

Hello, FranklinA47. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ronnie K. Pirovino, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ronnie K. Pirovino

Hello, FranklinA47. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ronnie K. Pirovino".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joey Primiani

Hello, FranklinA47. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Joey Primiani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Schminnte (talk • contribs) 23:01, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Non-crypto Public Chain" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Non-crypto Public Chain has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 19 § Non-crypto Public Chain until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]