User talk:GeorgeMoney/Archive07

Please see WP:MFD

Your page WP:TRUSTED is on MFD. Please see and vote.--May the Force be with you! Shr e shth91 ^{(review me!)} 10:30, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your TfD close

Greetings! I re-opened and re-closed the debate on Template:Listadmins - while you called the close correctly, a non-admin should never close a deletion debate with respect to a page that he or she was involved in creating. Indeed, an admin should really never do so either. You have the admin qualities, I think, but the duties are tied to the position. Be patient and you'll get there. Cheers! BD2412 T 23:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see rule #3 of Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-Administrators closing discussions. Yes, a non-admin can disclose a discussion, but "Non-administrators should not close discussions in which they have been involved". Cheers! BD2412 T 23:46, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Tssk, I was being complimentary. You took an admin action (closing a discussion in which you yourself had been involved) - but you did it correctly. In short, you did the wrong thing right - I'm not suggesting that you acted with malice or disregard for the rules, just that you unknowingly did something not permitted. However, perhaps you should be in a position to be so permitted. BD2412 T 00:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 5th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 23	5 June 2006	About the Signpost

New revision-hiding feature added	Paper profiles Wales, slams Wikipedia business coverage
Meetups And Newsworthy International Assemblages	New external tools
News and Notes: Wikimedia board resolutions, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report On Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Siblings

Don't tell me you're playing now! XD Sceptre's good, but, as Linuxerist points out, we were born just a couple of days apart. What's your next guess? Sergeant Snopake 07:01, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evil!

Here is an 6/6/6, aka Evil Day, greeting for you friend. These type of messages premote WikiLove in an unknown way. Spread this evil love to others by making a derivative work of this... Or another evil something that is flowing about. LINUX ERIST@ 19:50, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evil!

MUAHAHAHA

Here is an 6/6/6, aka Evil Day, greeting for you friend. These type of messages promote WikiLove in an unknown way. Spread this evil love to others by making a derivative work of this... Or another evil something that is flowing about. The King of Kings 20:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Reinhardt

I have an image that I uploaded and it keeps on asking me regarding copyright information that I have no knowledge of. Should I just delete it? It was given to me by a friend who got it off a federal government website that profiles judges. Thanks. Creator1981

WikiLove

Here's a burrito for you!

Burritos promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others using Template:smile! Happy editing! LINUX ERIST@ 01:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evil!

Here is an 6/6/6, aka Evil Day, warning for you, enemy. I am extremely evil and you have entered on my evil property. Spread this evil-ness to others by making a derivative work of this... Or another evil something that is flowing about. And, if you don't you will be a goodie too-shoos forever!! FellowWikip e dian 01:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice 666 template

But according to the wikipedia clocks it's now 766 or 676 now depending on how you write your date. :D Charli e^{( t | e )} 01:49, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Main Page Firefox 2.jpg

I tagged Image:Main Page Firefox 2.jpg with the {{badJPEG}} tag because images such as screenshots, maps, flags, graphs, charts, diagrams, and other images which have a few well-defined colors, sharp edges, and large blocks of color should almost always be saved in the PNG format, not the JPEG format, because JPEG suffers from compression artifacts. The JPEG format is best for photographs, paintings, and similar pictures. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Preparing images for upload for more information. Feel free to let me know if you have other questions. —Bkell (talk) 04:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the barnprinter. :) LINUX ERIST@ 05:55, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Must say I'm a fan of your Random Picture of the day... pictures are great ways to build articles. I uploaded Image:Queen square.jpg for June 13, 2006, but if you find it uninteresting, here's a substitute: Image:Lab coat and scrubs.jpg. Thanks. -- Samir धर्म 11:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for fixing that. How do you get to IRC. --Airforceguy ^Scramble! 00:31, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Per your request ;) Radio Kirk talk to me 01:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Friend

I added your name to this. Check it out and put your sig over my generic link, if you don't mind your name being there. Thanks! the_ed17^(T)_(C)^(P)_(U)^(F)_(WW) 02:07, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hmmm... NoSeptember 02:35, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, you edited the insomniacs box. But note, no one has reverted you, I just thought it was interesting experimentation. NoSeptember 03:13, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for catching the unsigned > refactored thing :-) NoSeptember 05:41, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Hey there

Hey, just wanted to let you know that Exploding Boy started something about your userpage at WP:AN. Just thought you might want to know. Later, Ch u ck^(척뉴넘) 00:28, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry. My mistake. See my comments on that page. Exploding Boy 00:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page and talk page

Why did you make it look like the Main page? I also know that your user page is not deleted. That's because you used a trick template. FellowWikip e dian 01:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for changing the page and not being too snippy about others editing it without asking you. :-) --Fastfission 02:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe

I love your edit summary here. =D AmiDaniel (talk) 03:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template deletions

I deleted them because they were pointless eg. {{Italics}}, there is no point of having a template to italicize when you can type "''" around the words, and because nobody, or vrey fre people, were using them. --Shanel ^§ 00:42, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets

Go to [1]. FellowWikip e dian 16:58, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning.

Regarding your edit to User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me:

Inserting silly HTML comments in people's comments is vandalism. It's a guestbook section, not a vandalism section.

I won't bother subst'ing the warning, but it's something you should be aware of. Cheers. 142.46.199.175 23:59, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was a vandalism section and that's that. And Nathan, don't log off to warn me. --GeorgeMoney ^T·C 00:02, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, it wasn't, and I'll prove it. Go to CSCWEM's userpage. Look at where the sections start and end.

Line 147:

Need......appetizah! Man...sleep would be a good thing too. Kukini 07:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is part of the "Other Insomniacs" section, not the Vandalism section which was below that. This should settle the argument once and for all. — Nathan (^talk) 00:48, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I thought it was a vandalism section. I am only human and I made a mistake. Big deal. --GeorgeMoney ^T·C 00:51, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Random Header

George, did you have too much coffee today...? Or have you just lost it? XD Aloha and good evening. O r e o s^TalkContribs 00:35, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFCU clerk

Please read Essjay's comment at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Clerks/Requests#Clerk role & impartiality. While I think your comment regarding David91 is accurate in every respect, it does not seem to fit Essjay's conception of our role. (There is also discussion at User:Essjay/Archives/34#More clerkcruft.) Cheers. Thatcher131 16:10, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Essjay made a comment somewhere about "If you can express the length of time in months and years rather than days and weeks, its too long for checkuser." I would tend to think that comment could be safely made, although I'm still trying to be very cautious myself. I asked him after I made this comment and he said it was fine because it was neutral and provided useful information. The time frame might fall into the same category, but I think the evidence and fishing issues did not (although as I said, you are entirely correct). If course, if someone who is not a clerk came along and made the same comment it would be no problem at all. :) Thatcher131 16:22, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spam #1

You are receiving this message, because you signed up to my spamlist

I'm sorry if this spam seems a little weird, but it is the first spam.

Dear people:

User:Iamthejabberwock needs a new name! Would you please suggest a username for him. The reason for this is because he doesn't want to get confused with User:Thejabberwock.

please help

Thanks, --—The-thing (Talk) (Stuff I did) 17:23, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please go to http://www.hrwiki.org it's awesome. —The-thing (Talk) (Stuff I did) 17:23, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 12th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 24	12 June 2006	About the Signpost

From the editor: RSS returns
English Wikipedia reaches 1,000 Featured Articles	Administrator desysopped after sockpuppeting incident
Meetups And Newsworthy International Assemblages	News and Notes: Wikimedia board resolutions, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report On Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Message delivered by Ralbot 01:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wherewiki.

Please see this. Thanks. — Nathan ^(talk) 17:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Dear George, thanks so much for supporting my request for adminship. Just leave me a message or send me an e-mail if you need any administrative help. You take care man -- Samir धर्म 08:21, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, dude

Hey. We haven't talked in a while. How are you? O r e o s^TalkContribs 01:20, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note

I'm feeling much better now! Hope you are well too. Regards --Charli e^{( t | e )} 02:43, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Supporting my RfA!

Thank you for supporting my Request for Adminship. I was approved by a tally of 54/6/1. If you see me doing anything that I shouldn't, please let me know. Thanks again, Ian Manka Talk to me! 05:06, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikifun starts on Sunday

Hi,

I thought you'd like to know: Wikifun Round 13 starts coming Sunday at 21:00 UTC. -- Eugène van der Pijll 18:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been sent to you because your user page is included in Category:Wake me for Wikifun.

Wikiproject

HEllo GeorgeMoney. I am Thetruthbelow, and I came here today to ask you to assist with a Wikiproject that myself and Moe Epsilon will be starting around the 26th of June. It will be called "The User Page Design Commitee", and we will assist users in creating User pages. I was wondering if you would like to be out third and last founder of the project. Give me your thoughts. Thetruthbelow 21:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

Thanks, I will ask them. Thetruthbelow 21:32, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Darn. :-( — The King of Kings 21:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sceptre said yes, so as of now we have you, myself, moe, and sceptere as founders. As of now, I am creating a rough draft of the project page. Thetruthbelow 22:02, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Made Wikiproject

I have just started the Wikiproject here. It is right here, and I would appreciate any work on it or the subpages that you do. Thanks, Thetruthbelow 22:29, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is really a rough draft, so make as many changes as you want. Thetruthbelow 22:30, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You mind if I move the Particpants section into the Designers sub-page? — The King of Kings 22:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer that. Thetruthbelow 22:45, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

They look good. Why don't you go ahead with that, and I will recruit some designers? This project is going to be great. Thetruthbelow 22:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Deleted!!!

Hey Tony Sidaway just deleted the project! Why? Thetruthbelow 23:24, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion. If Moe's attempt doesn't work out, will you arrange the deletion review as I have to leave soon. Thanks, and I hope it doesn't come to this, Thetruthbelow 23:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pics. AS of now, Moe is taking it to the deletion review, and I will be participating. Will you be there too? Thetruthbelow 23:40, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

deletion review

Moe Epsilon has started a deletion review for the Wikiproject. Your comments would be appreciated. Thetruthbelow 23:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. :-) — The King of Kings 00:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I sent you a transcript of what the e-mails said. I sent the first one on mistake because I accidentally hit enter, so the e-mail is blank :D Ignore that one. Read the second one. :) — The King of Kings 00:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DVD+R/W's RfA

Thank you for your support in my RfA, which ended with the result of (74/0/0). If there is anything I can help with feel free to ask. Also, if there is anything I am doing wrong, please point that out as well. I look forward to working with you in the future.

Highest regards, DVD+ R/W 01:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject

Hey george. Well they now how the wikiproject up for mfd here. You thoughts would be appreciated. Thetruthbelow 04:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New pages

Hey Geore, do you like the two new pages I created on the Do-It-Yourself section? I am trying to expand it, so any help would be appreciated. Thetruthbelow 02:10, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

formatting

hey george whatever you are doing, I can't view the pages anymore. Can you go back to the way they were before? Thetruthbelow 02:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

can we not have the headers? It was better before and it really is messing up my IE. Thetruthbelow 02:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THe problem was that the header was going over the text, and therefore erasing half of the text from the computer. Thetruthbelow 02:56, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am making new headers, tell me what you think.Thetruthbelow 03:05, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe we shouldn't do header. The title of the page without them is ugly, but at least it doesn't mess up the formatting of the page. Thetruthbelow 03:08, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GREAT JOB EXPANDING

sorry about the caps, but you did a great job on expanding the font format section of the DO-it-yourself. Thetruthbelow 02:58, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move wikiproject

Would you have any objection to me changing the project name to "Wikiproject:User page help"? Let me know, as I won't make any changes till after I have your opinion. Thetruthbelow 04:11, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good Suggestion about the move, but I already moved the page and all of its sub pages. The title is now Wikiproject:User Page Help. Thanks, Thetruthbelow 04:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just as bad

Sorry, but the header is just as bad. I tried viewing it on another computer, and It is still bad. I am going to revert it. Thanks for trying. Thetruthbelow 04:52, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was overflowing and eating the text. I think that we are better without the header, although I love headers myself. Thetruthbelow 04:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

perfect

yes. Its is perfect. After you do the first page though, let me know to see if it is alright. Thanks, Thetruthbelow 05:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

well, the height is good, in that it is not eating the text. However, the left side of the heading doesn't go all the way over, so that you see half of the first letter. Thetruthbelow 05:15, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you see about half of the first letter of the orignal heading. Thetruthbelow 05:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its good, except that the links below it to the other pages, such as the main page, aren't there. Good we just not do the headers? It isn't working. Thetruthbelow 06:14, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IT WORKS

Its perfect now. Don't change a thing. Thetruthbelow 06:16, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Try one, and I will check it to make sure it works. Thank you for doing all this, I really appreciate it. Thetruthbelow 06:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Headers

Lets not use the big headings on the Wikipedia namespace only our userspace. Its probably highly frowned upon to do it elsewhere. — The King of Kings 06:31, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, its more trouble than it is worth. Thanks for trying though. Thetruthbelow 06:33, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The trouble I was talking about was the possible complaints from users, such as the admin that tried to delete us in the first place (I think you know to whom I refer ;D. The page is okay without them, and I really don't want any more negative attention on the page. I appreciate all of your work though. Thetruthbelow 06:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it is very ugly without them :( But nothing we can do. Better not put the project in the line of any more fire. — The King of Kings 06:39, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I think the font family part of the project is really useful. We have done really good on a project that was only started today. Congrats everyone. Thetruthbelow 06:46, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]