User talk:Gibbs629

I want to create a page. I'm new here and I'm trying to follow the directions and do 10 edits.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EricEnfermero was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Gibbs629/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EricEnfermero (Talk) 03:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Gibbs629, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EricEnfermero (Talk) 03:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Gibbs629/sandbox. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Attempting to submit a frivolous article to Articles for Creation is not the way to get your ten edits to be autoconfirmed. Just edit in articles or on talk pages. Submitting frivolous articles is tendentious. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of My Brotherz Keepa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on My Brotherz Keepa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. EricEnfermero (Talk) 04:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio and notability

Hey, I thought I'd explain why the pages got deleted. With the web series, it was because there was no coverage to show where the series would pass notability guidelines. By this I mean that there doesn't seem to be any news articles or reviews in places that would be considered an independent reliable source. It's fairly difficult for web series, let alone any web content, to get the type and amount of coverage necessary to pass notability guidelines per WP:GNG.

Also, I noticed that your article for NeNe Capri was taken wholesale from her Amazon author bio. This is considered to be a copyright violation and as such, had to be removed. Copyright is automatically assumed with any content unless it's posted someplace that marks the content as fair use. I also didn't really see where that article had any sources either. Unfortunately it's really, really super hard for a lot of urban fiction authors to gain coverage because at best, they're outright ignored by the places that Wikipedia considers to be reliable. Heck, it took me a while to gather enough sources to really show notability for Nikki Turner and she's considered to be one of the reigning queens of UF. It's pretty frustrating overall when you get UF authors who are very popular and publish through a major UF publisher, yet they don't get the coverage. However there still needs to be sources, so unfortunately I don't know that Capri would pass guidelines for authors per WP:NAUTHOR.

However if you want to try to make this article, feel free to do so. I'd recommend that you start first in your userspace or at WP:AfC, the articles for creation process. This would give you more time to work on the article and if you go through AfC, your article will get reviewed by another editor, who will decide if it's ready to be moved to the mainspace. I also want to extend an invitation to the WP:TEAHOUSE, which is a great place to ask questions about Wikipedia in general. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:08, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MyBrotherz Keepa (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MyBrotherz Keepa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at User:Gibbs629/sandbox. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Just continuing to resubmit a declined draft isn't going to get it accepted into article space. It will only annoy the reviewers and the administrators. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NeNe Capri (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Naraht was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NeNe Capri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Naraht (talk) 15:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:MyBrotherz Keepa concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:MyBrotherz Keepa, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:NeNe Capri concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:NeNe Capri, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:MyBrotherz Keepa

Hello, Gibbs629. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "MyBrotherz Keepa".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 22:37, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NeNe Capri

Hello, Gibbs629. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "NeNe Capri".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 10:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]