User talk:Halo Jerk1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nuvola apps kuser.svg This user may sometimes share an IP address with: Flyer22.

I'm my own man. Don't judge me on my sister's contributions. I will be making a name for myself here.

Lesbian sexual practices[edit]

Well, I'm not a sockpuppet and I find the added reference valid. If there's no reason to remove it other than being added by a sockpuppet, it can stay there because I added it. Diego (talk) 14:14, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the swift reply to my comment.[1] I see your point. You adding it back is not much different than my sister adding it back. And at least he kept his word not to remove the reliably sourced information that he was removing before. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 14:19, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
I don't think of this as you supporting him either. I apologize for that wording in my heading to you. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 14:21, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Halo Jerk1, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Halo Jerk1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Jodi Arias trial for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jodi Arias trial is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jodi Arias trial until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Youreallycan 09:30, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Okay, cool. I thought it may be deleted, but I couldn't resist creating it. It has a high chance of being recreated later on anyway. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 09:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jodi Arias trial, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HLN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Why are you so obsessed with me?[edit]

I simply took out the LGBT bias known to frequent your sister's topics. In a battle of truth vs. LGBT bias, I stand with truth. But I know where you stand. And seriously, stop being obsessive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 05:53, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Bias my ass. And your assumption that's she's LGBT when she works on all kinds of sexual topics is ridiculous! And I'm not obsessed with you at all. It's the other way around, which is why you took the time to reply and out yourself (pun intended). Thanks for taking the bait. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Well I would have reminded/suggested to your sister that the other topic needed the additional source as well, but I decided to do it myself instead of bother her with reminders. And yes you do seem to be obsessed but we shall agree to disagree. Have a nice day. I don't wish to war with you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 06:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Okay, fine. I guess I can call a truce, as long as you don't go back to the same kind of destructive editing you did before. I'm not obsessed with you or my sister, but I do appreciate the work she does and don't like to see it unjustifiably wrecked. I had decided to keep an eye out for you because you had edited destructively before. Peace. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 06:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Seriously, chill down a bit. I know you're concerned, but you'll end up getting blocked for WP:CIVIL if you're not careful. Inb4 someone else - Alison 18:22, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

I just revdeled that edit summary -- if you must swear multiple times, and in capital letters, please DON'T do it somewhere it's not possible to rephrase.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:42, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Forgive me for not replying in a more timely fashion, when that madness was taking place. I don't curse much, mainly while playing online video gaming. I apologize and will try not to let it happen again. Is cursing not allowed here? I've seen others curse at this site when upset. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 21:42, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
He's now commenting on my sister at WP:ANI.[2] Halo Jerk1 (talk) 22:21, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

STOP. Ignore the ip. Let an admin block him if he is indeed committing puppetry. Don't give him any satisfaction. WP:DENY  little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer
22:50, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

His groundless comment about my sister will still be there if someone doesn't remove it each time. He keeps coming back like a cockroach. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 22:52, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Ignore it. Let others remove it for you.  little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer
22:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Who's going to remove it for me? If others only block, I'll do the removing. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 22:57, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
I will keep an eye on it. I've also contacted an admin via IRC over this issue. User:The Blade of the Northern Lights blocked the ip user and will monitor ANI for this diff as well.  little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer
23:04, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
I saw your revert. Thanks. But if his comment ever stays for too long, I'll revert. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 23:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail![edit]

Hello, Halo Jerk1. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 23:11, 28 January 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

  little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer
23:11, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Slanderous accusations[edit]

You wrote in the page talk for Killing of Travis Alexander: "I also wonder if MaxxFordham and are the same person." a number of times. I have no affiliation with this user so if you spread baseless and unfounded accusations I will take action next time. EDIT: In fact it was BabbaQ who has been blocked for abuse of multiple accounts and socketpuppeting. -- (talk) 12:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Why do you bring me up at a discussion which doesnt involve me IP and in fact it seems like you are implying that I am Maxx which can only to be considered slander. Could you please stop mentioning me at different posts it is starting to look quite pathetic, especially here were I am not even involved in your dispute with this user. The IPs obsession with bringing me up at discussions is flattering but mostly amusing. Would not be surprised if the IP blames me for the famine in Africa and the war in Syria too. Lol. --BabbaQ (talk) 18:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
BabbaQ, a few things:
1. The only thing that is "lolable" is the fact that you made 6 edits to this post over 4 hours. wtf!?
(cur | prev) 18:46, 23 February 2013‎ BabbaQ (talk | contribs)‎ . . (11,345 bytes) (+1)‎ . . (→‎Slanderous accusations) (undo)
(cur | prev) 18:46, 23 February 2013‎ BabbaQ (talk | contribs)‎ . . (11,344 bytes) (+178)‎ . . (→‎Slanderous accusations) (undo)
(cur | prev) 18:43, 23 February 2013‎ BabbaQ (talk | contribs)‎ . . (11,166 bytes) (+66)‎ . . (→‎Slanderous accusations) (undo)
(cur | prev) 17:36, 23 February 2013‎ BabbaQ (talk | contribs)‎ . . (11,100 bytes) (+87)‎ . . (→‎Slanderous accusations) (undo)
(cur | prev) 15:52, 23 February 2013‎ BabbaQ (talk | contribs)‎ . . (11,013 bytes) (+132)‎ . . (→‎Slanderous accusations: LOL) (undo)
(cur | prev) 14:56, 23 February 2013‎ BabbaQ (talk | contribs)‎ . . (10,881 bytes) (+141)‎ . . (→‎Slanderous accusations) (undo)
That's pretty pathetic.
2. How did you even know I posted this? You must be stalking my edits which is very pathetic and shows your obsession with me.
3. Were you, or were you not, blocked for abusing multiple accounts and for harassing users and making personal attacks?? Exactly. (talk) 19:05, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
LOL. I believe Halo Jerk can make a good assessment of your behaviour overall from the reply above. Bye.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:45, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Yep, obviously didn't answer : "How did you even know I posted this?". Now, stop stalking me please. (talk) 20:50, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

I don't like it when someone threatens me, especially since the threat can't really be exacted, but I apologize for the offense I've seemed to have caused. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 17:24, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

It has now been confirmed that IP87.232.1.48 was using more then one IP doing edits and has been blocked for three months. And probably including Maxxfordham to. Just would like for you to know that Halo Jerk :)--BabbaQ (talk) 13:57, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, man. Yesterday, I read your note and your last interactions with the IP. I check in on Wikipedia articles frequently. But I usually sign out after I get off Wikipedia, and I don't check my user page or talk page much, so that's why I missed your note until then. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi there[edit]

Just chill a little, please? - don't wanna see either of you blocked. The other editor likely doesn't know WP:DTTR - Alison 00:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Okay. But look at the other editor's talk page. That editor does know about it, has been warned about it before. Besides, the warning that editor gave me was utterly bogus. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 01:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
And, (maybe unrelated), seeing as there have already been blocks for socking, you should not likely close or collapse anything on this specific talkpage, like, ever - that kinda stuff just reaaaallllyy makes it look more and more like collusion of some variety (✉→BWilkins←✎) 17:01, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
She reverted me and scolded me about it (off-Wiki), so there's no collusion. I haven't even been around my sister on Wikipedia in months. I collapsed the section after she reverted me because it seems reasonable and she doesn't need the added stress it may cause. She hasn't reverted again because she said it looks silly edit warring with her brother. If the other editor wants to comment badly enough, my thread collapsing won't stop the editor. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 17:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
And I've reverted you. Please just let her deal with it herself, ok? I don't care what your rationale was; it looks like collusion to the casual observer. Besides, Flyer22 is old enough to decide for herself what's on her talk page and has even reverted my own removal of vandalism from her talk. Just let her deal with it herself - Alison 17:37, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
You mean this[3]? Thank you for attempting to revert that disgusting piece. Heh, I've held back from firing off on that IP. That shows that I'm trying not to bother or overbear my sister on Wikipedia. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 18:17, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Indeed :) Well, you know her better than I do, so you already know that there's no point arguing :) - Alison 18:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC)


Are we going to allow a user running a pro-Jodi Arias blog change the entire article? It is starting to look like a pro-Jodi segment of the users blog more than a unbiased article on the events.BabbaQ (talk) 12:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

I've been tracking the article and talk page since she joined and it's getting way out of hand. I don't know all of the ins and outs of wiki editing, so I can't make a lot of references to rules she's broken, but the hypocrisy of this editor is awe inspiring. What can be done to prevent further edits from this editor to ensure the neutrality of the article? Wanderingchilde (talk) 21:27, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
An admin or similar should be contacted. I suggest you contact for example user Bishonen he is good with keeping articles neutral. --BabbaQ (talk) 21:31, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Pardon my ignorance, but I can't figure out how to get in touch with Bishonen. Can you assist? Wanderingchilde (talk) 21:44, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Sure. Search User:Bishonen. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 21:47, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. At this section. Darkness Shines (talk) 07:20, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Excuse my tardiness, but I've had a lot of stuff to take care of while I was off Wikipedia. BabbaQ, I was doing my part to keep the article away from Geebee2's slants. And because I knew that I'd be gone for a few days, I went to Darkness Shines for help. You know about that thread now.[4] Halo Jerk1 (talk) 16:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
I apologize Halo. Ofcourse you are right about removing certain parts of the Travis article. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
But I hope someone removes the Geebee material soon. --BabbaQ (talk) 18:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
It's okay. By doing this,[5] you were attempting to do something similar to what I did (a revert you thanked me for).[6] You were doing what you thought was right. And because of how Geebee2 is, I can't blame you for that.
As for "Geebee2 material," let's discuss that on the talk page where I brought it up.[7] Halo Jerk1 (talk) 18:31, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
HaloJerk There is an entire web-site following this article we were really disturbed by what GeeBee2 was doing to it. I'm glad to see that GeeBee2 was banned and that the article will be revised. I noticed you were concerned about GeeBee2 getting back on here under another IP if that happens believe me there are a bunch of people that will be letting you know. Again if you need any assistance I would be happy to help in any way I can.Mistywaters (talk) 22:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Mos:intro listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]


An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mos:intro. Since you had some involvement with the Mos:intro redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 01:22, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you![edit]

Meissen-teacup pinkrose01.jpg He I wanna treet you a cup of tea . AlphaPatel (talk) 10:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 19:44, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

e-mail response[edit]

Hello, Halo Jerk1. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added John Carter (talk) 18:50, 17 October 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

John Carter, I'll read it soon. I've been so busy since I sent you that email. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 23:43, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Your draft RfC/U mentioned[edit]

FYI Incidents#Proposal_for_interaction_ban_or_1RR_restriction_between_Pass_a_Method_and_StAnselm. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:26, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Left two comments.[8] I got a username notification about the proposal too anyhoo. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 04:00, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
We really have a problem with depletion of non-POV/Fringe religion editors. Would you mind looking at recent activity at Hebrew Gospel hypothesis. Thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:01, 31 December 2013 (UTC)


Hello, Halo Jerk1. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Middayexpress (talk) 16:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

The Grier School Page[edit]

I had made additions to the Grier School Page. They were deleted. I would like to know why, so that I do not make that same mistake again. I am in the process of working with the school on the history of the school and the Grier family. I do not want any trouble. Please advise. ( (talk) 02:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC))

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)