User talk:Hietanbs

License tagging for Image:Srch1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Srch1.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:07, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Srch18.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Srch18.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Episode review for season one articles of 24[edit]

The individual episode articles for this series are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines. Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:24 (season 1)#24 episode review (season 1). Thanks. -- Ned Scott 07:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:LC logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:LC logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:11, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:LC logo.pdf)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:LC logo.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:50, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Former Golf Major Championship Pages[edit]

Ben, great job creating the 2005 and 2006 PGA Championship articles. There is a new PGA Championships template for easy navigation. I'm all for creating a page for each major championship dating back to the 1860 Open Championship. Keep up the good work! :) Supertigerman 01:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another infobox needs to be created for individual tournaments. The template currently being used was originally designed for main tournament pages, and works well for those. Some things to add to the new infobox would be the dates that the tournament took place, removal of the "defunct" field, and the winner's prize money. I'm sure you'd agree that not having the winner of the tournament in the infobox is rather sad. What other ideas do you have for a new infobox? Supertigerman 22:51, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template[edit]

Excellent so far; the color scheme is nice - sticking to the light blue of the golf tournament infobox. A couple of additions that I think would enhance it are the "Winner's share" (under the purse) and "Score" under the "Tournament Champion" heading and below the winner's name. Supertigerman 16:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I updated it, but am not sure about the Score location. Currently it is directly beneath the name. Should it have its own heading? Supertigerman 17:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think a runners up field would be helpful because some majors have up to 4 runners up, which would clutter up the infobox unnecessarily. I'm still not positive about the "Score" location. Perhaps it should be to the right of the winner's name and not below it? Supertigerman 01:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Template:24 season 1 episodes[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:24 season 1 episodes, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:24 season 1 episodes is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:24 season 1 episodes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:2006OpenLogo.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:2006OpenLogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logo pga2005 lg.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo pga2005 lg.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Golf[edit]

Hi Hietanbs
I thought that a way to further improve the golf articles on Wikipedia is for the whole project to work together towards a goal. An example of this could be a certain number of good articles in so many months, or to create the project's first ever featured article. If you are interested, come to the talk page and discuss it. And hopefully through this the project can continue to work towards several goals in the near future. Grover 10:07, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to discuss goals for WP:Golf[edit]

You are invited. Go to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Golf#Goals. michfan2123 15:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"T" in majors leaderboards[edit]

All the official sites Masters, U.S. Open, British Open, PGA Championship use the "T" as does the PGA Tour for its weekly events, e.g Honda Classic leaderboard and results It is a standard notation.Tewapack (talk) 05:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Russell Hantz[edit]

Hello, Hietanbs. You have new messages at Talk:Russell Hantz.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2011 The Players Championship[edit]

I strongly believe this tournament doesn't deserve but in any case, if you're going to start one, you should make sure the article has right information. The 3rd round scores are all wrong.- William 20:05, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Masters Tournament and 2011 Women's British Open[edit]

These need to be fixed if you can do them.SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? (talk) 03:31, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We need to come up with one standard to use for the rounds and the past champions, so if you want it to be the hypenated way, then we have to correct the past champions or vice versa.SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? (talk) 03:34, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I already fixed the past champions on the 2011 PGA Championship article if you want to see how I accomplished the change over.SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? (talk) 04:04, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting the 2008 Masters Tournament final leaderboard.SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? (talk) 04:11, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Hietanbs. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Srch9.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Srch9.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]