User talk:Homebuilding

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Homebuilding, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Db099221 03:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

External links[edit]

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia for the purpose of attracting visitors to these sites. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 06:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Social Work[edit]

I notice you have contributed to the discussion of the article Social work. I have created a new WikiProject, WikiProject Social Work. I have begun to work on this project and I would love to have your help. Please take a look at it and consider joining the project. Many thanks, Ursasapien (talk) 05:15, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Social Work Wikiproject[edit]

Could you take a look at the discussion going on at the talk page and add any comments you might have? Thanks, Ursasapien (talk) 10:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Homebuilding. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Articles for deletion nomination of Social Work in the Relationship Education Movement[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated Social Work in the Relationship Education Movement, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Work in the Relationship Education Movement. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Button sig.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Sudden unintended acceleration[edit]

Hey, saw your recent post on the term used to describe, broadly the phenomenon. I might agree with your sentiment, but think nonetheless the term has become the de facto "handle" for describing the phenomenon. But do you think you could find a good source to substantiate your opinion — say, something from the NYT or WSJ — something really solid, that supports the view that "sudden unintended acceleration" is a misnomer? If so, it belongs in the article. 842U (talk) 15:35, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Homebuilding. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lehigh, Kansas[edit]

Where are the references for your edits? • SbmeirowTalk • 02:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia is suppose to be verifiable, otherwise it is considered original research. The article WP:No original research states "The only way you can show your edit is not original research is to cite a reliable published source that contains the same material", which means that "eyewitness account" is original research. I could add mounds of text to Wikipedia for cities in Marion County as eyewitness accounts, but I can't, per Wikipedia rules. • SbmeirowTalk • 20:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Keystone Pipeline[edit]

If you want to upload photos that YOU took, then follow my instructions that I wrote up after I learned how to do it. If you did NOT take the photos, then don't upload the photos because Wikipedia is extremely picky about photo copyrights. None of my photos have been removed by Wikipedia. How To Upload Photos To Wikipedia by Steve MeirowskySbmeirowTalk • 18:29, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


Hello. I saw your edit summary "germane referral to another wikipedia site". For your information, what you called a "wikipedia site" we normally just call an "article" (on the same site, namely the English Wikipedia), and such a referral we usually call a "wikilink". This is not meant to be pedantic; the point is that using shared terminology helps us to communicate with ease.

Also, there is no point in trying to sign an edit summary with ~~~~; it just doesn't work. We normally only sign contributions to talk pages and similar discussion pages.  --Lambiam 01:46, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Edit summaries[edit]

You don't need to write ~~~~ in edit summaries: this doesn't become your signature, and the edit is already attributed to you in the page history. Sorry to point this out, but I thought I should tell you. --Rubbish computer 02:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Erica Enders-Stevens: Source available for reaction time?[edit]

Hi. I see you've put a lot of time into the wording in the Erica Enders-Stevens article, about her reaction time ("A central part of her success in drag racing competition relates to her superior ability in establishing very low reaction time..."). A while ago, it was marked as "Citation Needed", because there's no reference included to substantiate the information. Do you have a reference that can be added to the article? Otherwise, this just looks like original research, which you probably know is not suitable for inclusion (Wikipedia:No_original_research). Thanks. Gmporr (talk) 16:10, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)