Jump to content

User talk:Illuusio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Illuusio, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Writing articles from published sources

[edit]

Please note that Wikipedia articles have to be based on published, verifiable information. This means that we can't ordinarily make use of original ideas or research. You can read more about these policies at WP:Verifiability and WP:No original research. --05:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Illuusio, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! hajatvrc @ 22:16, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I would like to note that we already have an article on Theory of everything. Perhaps instead of creating a new article you can just help out with that one? hajatvrc @ 22:18, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

further advice

[edit]

Please do not submit this again. It will never make an article until the theory is written about by other people, with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources. Wikipedia is not a place for original thought. Please turn your efforts to topics about which there is published information from such sources. DGG ( talk ) 05:47, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Theory of everything, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, DVdm (talk) 05:35, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Theory of everything

[edit]

Wikipedia is a wrong venue for promoting new theories that are not yet covered in reliable secondary sources. Please reconsider. Materialscientist (talk) 10:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]