User talk:Indiansociology

Indiansociology, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Indiansociology! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:43, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yadav

Hi Indiansociology. I wanted to let you know that I have reverted your edits on Yadav. The changes you have made have been proposed over the years on the talk page of the article over the years and have not gained consensus. You removed multiple reliable sources that verify the information in the article. If you have problems, please continue dialog on the talk page or try the dispute resolution process. Ish dar ian 07:19, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mayabhai ahir

Hello Indiansociology,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mayabhai ahir for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Roborule (talk) 18:41, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mayabhai ahir

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mayabhai ahir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Your Friendly Neigborhood Wikipedian (talk) 08:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pran Sukh Yadav

The article Pran Sukh Yadav has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. From unreliable caste websites etc, he appears to have existed but the only printed sources I can find are equally unreliable (Gyan-published, for example) or mention him only in passing (Encyclopaedia Indica). Just another of the many local heroes of the Indian revolution.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 14:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ras Behari Lal Mandal

The article Ras Behari Lal Mandal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. No evidence of awards or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:12, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ahir/Yadav edit warring

I'll be blunt: I think that you are a returning user. Your edits to Ahir- and Yadav-related articles are pushing the typical caste POV that has been a long-term feature of such sockmasters as Dewan357 (talk · contribs) and they fly in the face of consensus and reliable sources, as discussed on umpteen occasions at the article talk pages. Right now, I'm not in a position to delve for proof of socking and I am prepared to discuss the issues with you as and when I am fit to do anything at all - if I were you, I'd think that was a good bargain. Edit warring is a blockable offence, the articles are subject to the sanctions outlined at WP:GS/Caste, and you need also to bear in mind the bold-revert-discuss cycle. Just to make it clear to you, I'm notifying you of the latter point below. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 20:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

Ahir

You are still reinstating challenged material at Ahir. Please take it to Talk:Ahir and note WP:BRD. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 01:41, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ahir. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 23:16, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--I am respecting all the policies mentioned.Well referenced edit was removed without viting credible reasons or providing evidence.Just reverted that

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - Sitush (talk) 02:34, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Ahir. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. - 2/0 (cont.) 05:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban from articles covered by WP:CASTES

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are banned from editing any page related to social groups, be they castes, communities, tribes, clans, kootams, gotras etc., explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. This sanction is to apply until 2015-03-16.

You have been sanctioned edit warring and disruptive editing

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at decision#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. - 2/0 (cont.) 05:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Dear. We appreciate and need your contribution on many articles, yet I would like to suggest that you should passionately convince others on your views and listen them to understand what's needed by them. Mahensingha 19:52, 25 March 2014 (UTC)