User talk:Jake.Vonn

Leave a Message

Leave a message and remember to sign your post! I'll reply back on my own page to your inquiry. Jake.Vonn (talk) 18:45, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Jake.Vonn! I am Marcus Qwertyus and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

-- Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Jake.Vonn/Jason Gray

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Jake.Vonn/Jason Gray. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Jason Gray. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Jason Gray - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Zelse81 (talk) 20:19, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Centricity Music

Hi. Welcome, again, to Wikipedia. The immediate reason why I deleted the article Centricity Music on 28 May was that its only author, user Luca200983 (talk · contribs), had blanked the page; but the reason he did that is probably that another user had tagged it for speedy deletion with the tag {{db-org}} "article about a company, corporation, organization, or group that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject", and indeed the article was pretty thin, with no text other than an artist list and no reference other than the company's own website.

As you are interested in improving it, I have restored into a user sub-page for you to work on: you will find it at User:Jake.Vonn/Centricity Music. For guidance on how to develop it, read:

The key to establishing notability, a requirement to have a Wikipedia article, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated, is showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The point is that we don't make value judgements about what is significant; we simply ask, have other people, independent of the subject, found it significant enough to write about?

When you have done your best with the draft article, post a request at WP:Requests for feedback to get some other views. If people think it is ready, you can move it into the main encyclopedia space. You must do that by using the Move tab (in a drop-down menu at the top of the screen, just left of the search box), not by cutting and pasting, because the license terms requires that if we use Luca200983's work we must maintain the attribution to him contained in the article history. S/he may be interested in helping develop the article.

You won't be able to do a move until your account becomes autoconfirmed, but that only takes ten edits and four days, so that should not be a problem. I'm afraid I am about to go away for a time, so I shall not be around to help, but if you have any problems you can post a question at the WP:Help desk, or put {{helpme}} on your talk page with a question below it. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:29, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Jason Gray

Re your message: Yes, you can create the article in your user space at User:Jake.Vonn/Jason Gray, for example. You can work on articles in your user space at your own pace. Once the article is completed, you can move the article into the Wikipedia main space. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:49, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But, and it's an important but, you must not copy-paste the article into your user-space, work on it, and then copy-paste the result back. The reason is that the terms of the license on which everyone contributes to Wikipedia are that their work may be copied provided that attribution is maintained, and that is done by the edit history. I don't think Gogo Dodo realised that you were planning to copy an existing article into your user space. I suppose you could do that for experimental purposes, to tinker with it and try out changes, but when you come to update the actual copy in the encyclopedia you must work on that, making changes to the existing version, not copy back a version you copy-pasted out; and when finished with your userspace version you should tag it {{db-u1}} to get it deleted. Better, really, not to have article copies detached from their history floating around. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:54, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Lanae' Hale Hat.png

Thanks for uploading File:Lanae' Hale Hat.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Centricity_wikipedia.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Centricity_wikipedia.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 02:46, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Jake.Vonn, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Jake.Vonn/Centricity Music. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Downhere - Photography Copyright

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Downhere_on_a_building.jpg

Hello Jake.Vonn,

It appears you are claiming copyright to the above photographed material. I believe this is a copyright infringement, as the photographic work actually belongs to Nashville based photographer, Tec Petaja (http://www.tecpetaja.com). I suspect you may be claiming copyright to similar photographic work of musical artists within this genre. I would advise that you please follow ethical guidelines, and set a good example.

Regards. Impressme (talk) 19:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Jake.Vonn/Jason Gray

User:Jake.Vonn/Jason Gray, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jake.Vonn/Jason Gray and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jake.Vonn/Jason Gray during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 13:42, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Matt Papa Library.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Matt Papa Library.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Redsky89 (talk) 07:20, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centricity logo.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Centricity logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Centricity Music Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Centricity Music Logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Senator2029 “Talk” 14:15, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Centricity Music Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Centricity Music Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]