User talk:Jakeswish

Jakeswish, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Jakeswish! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eros Innovations[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eros Innovations, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 16:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Eros Innovations, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Pahunkat (talk) 22:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jakeswish. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jakeswish. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jakeswish|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Blablubbs|talk 12:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Jakeswish. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Pahunkat (talk) 22:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eros Innovations for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eros Innovations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eros Innovations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Pahunkat (talk) 09:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kristin Patrick (January 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noidaabc was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kristin Patrick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kristin Patrick, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lord Grandwell (talk) 22:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kristin Patrick for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristin Patrick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristin Patrick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lord Grandwell (talk) 11:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kristin Patrick (January 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kristin Patrick instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

The article has been nominated for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft can be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft can be kept for possible improvement in the future.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kristin Patrick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kristin Patrick, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI/Paid editing[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Possibly (talk) 23:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

Hi Jakeswish, as you notice above, many editors are concerned that you have a conflict of interest with Kristin Patrick and/or Eros Innovations. It is very important for editors to declare conflicts of interest. To help you with a possible declaration, please answer the following questions below:

Do you know Kristin Patrick in real life, either as a family member, friend, collegue, or other relationship? You do not need to disclose the nature of the relationship; a simple yes or no will suffice.
Do you work for Kristin Patrick or Eros Innovations in any capacity? Again, details are not necessary, just a yes or a no.
Have you been paid by anyone to edit Kristin Patrick or Eros Innovations? Payment can include money, volunteering at an internship or receiving a grade in school for editing this work.

Please answer these questions before continuing to edit these articles. If you have any questions, please post below or on the help desk. Z1720 (talk) 23:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am a college student who has learned immensely from my mentor, Kristin Patrick. I advise her with digital content and strategy. I am not being paid for these edits.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakeswish (talk • contribs) 23:41, January 21, 2021 (UTC)

Hi Jakeswish. I'm really glad that you were able to learn a lot from a mentor. I think this relationship with Kristin Patrick is a conflict of interest. I advise that you immediately stop editing all articles involving Kristin in any way, including Kristin's article and Eros Innovations. Instead, please read WP:COI carefully and ask questions at the help desk (click me!) After reading that document, please disclose your conflict of interest by following the instructions at WP:DISCLOSE.

From now on, I highly recommend that you use Template:Request Edit whenever you are editing a page related to Kristin Patrick. This allows non-COI editors to review your proposal and assess whether it should be published on Wikipedia. Instructions on how to use Template:Request Edit can be found at Template:Request edit/Instructions. If you have any questions, please post at WP:HELPDESK. Thanks and happy editing! Z1720 (talk) 00:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will do! Thank you!

Jakeswish (talk) 00:02, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kristin Patrick[edit]

Hello, Jakeswish. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kristin Patrick, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kristin Patrick[edit]

Hello, Jakeswish. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kristin Patrick".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]