User talk:Javierito92

Welcome!

Hello, Javierito92, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! PeterSymonds (talk) 20:47, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Dumb blonde, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Posted By Alex Waelde (talk) 20:55, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Explanation

the addition of "(her name was kim)" this edit is not relevant or part of the joke. this is simply a notification. not a warning. please make sure you can cite additions to current data to prove its validity. see you around. Posted By Alex Waelde (talk) 21:01, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Follow Up

i'm not quite sure i follow? aside from the warning above im not sure as to what you're referring to? let me know Posted By Alex Waelde (talk) 05:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

reversion of comment on heliocentrism

I undid your reversion of a comment on the discussion page - despite being unsigned, the comment seemed to me to be worthy of a response. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 10:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

No problem - I was simply letting you know as a curtesy. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 12:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

re: welcome

dude I'm not new here... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cncplyr (talk • contribs) 14:55, 4 October 2009 (UTC) LMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAOOOO I JUS EDITED WIKIPEDIA XD —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.198.39 (talk) 15:17, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Your warning on User talk:Mttcmbs

I see that after he complained about someone reverting his edit, you reverted and warned him. It looks like you realized your mistake, and reverted yourself, but you haven't removed your warning. Could you kindly do so? Thanks. Until It Sleeps ^{Talk • Contribs} 14:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Your signature

Also, I couldn't help but notice that you have images in your signature. It is Wikipedia's policy that images in signatures are explicitly forbidden. I would recommend reading up on the signature policy to see exactly what is and isn't allowed. Until It Sleeps ^{Talk • Contribs} 14:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, your signature is suitable now. Cheers! Until It Sleeps ^{Talk • Contribs} 15:11, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi

You said you wanted to talk to me...

Leave1 (talk) 21:19, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

...for the revert on my user page! Ginsengbomb (talk) 08:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Ginsengbomb has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Speedy

Man you're quick, I was reporting 67.182.212.248 to AIV, but you beat me to it. :) Thanks! --Nsaum75 (talk) 09:20, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Twinkle. I have Huggle too, but use Twinkle more out of personal preference. --Nsaum75 (talk) 09:31, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

I haven't done much vandalism patrolling on Spanish Wiki; I mainly perform article creation & maintenance there. I think HG is faster on English Wiki though. --Nsaum75 (talk) 09:40, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Oh Sophie!

Actually, Javierito, the blanking was done by the article creator, which as you know is permitted as a way to ask for speedy deletion.... thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it's difficult to pick up on that when you're using Huggle, which only shows you the last edit. You'd have to go back and check the history. But it's all the same in the end, anyway. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:35, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Michael Tellinger

This guy has no links to back up anything he wrote, its obvious that he created his own page just to get attention. please delete it, its a waste of space. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.91.152.115 (talk) 20:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I noticed that you reverted vandalizm at the article Jacobson radical (an article on which I have worked) within one minute! I thought that was my job; at least for that particular article (I thought that only two people had that article on their watchlist)... You must be very dedicated to fighting vandalizm - thanks! PST 03:29, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

dostoyevsky website

hey, why did you taked off? i think it's useful.--César (talk) 23:16, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism

Wow Javierito92!

Very efficient choice of Tools!

I noticed you use Twinkle, Huggle and Lupin's Anti-Vandal Tool as well as me!

I have run into 10 of your reverting edits as I try to rollback them!

Just to say, well done!
Limideen 11:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Supongo tú hablan español, y sólo para decir lo que dije en primer lugar, bien hecho, con todas sus ediciones!

(Desde Google Translate)
Limideen 11:30, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Thunder Collins

Hello, I did a Courtesy Blank on Thunder Collins.

I did not intentionally mean to "attack" him and apologize that it came off that way.

I searched for a page for him on Wikipedia and found none, so decided to start one. The only recent info that I had was the current info about his situation.

I assumed that others would come along and add to his biography, but instead it was viewed as an attack on the person, which it wasn't.

It seems that I have come under attack by a few users on my posts, but I have made posts without logging in previously that were not viewed as spam.

It's weird that once I joined and started posting as a logged in user, I became a target.

I subscribe to a Celeb/News Blog and when info comes through the Feed, I check Wikipedia to see if it has already been posted and provide a Source.

Blogs as sources are allowed from what I have read in the policies. It would be unfair for a Source to have to be a big name news site.

If my source was a particular blog, then that is what I cite.

I've also noticed that many times Users will delete my source, but keep the news from that source reported. This is not how I understood Wikipedia to work. Anything that I post deserves to have a source added to it. So, if a blog is my source, why should I not give them credit for it.

According to the Guidelines that I have read, we are first to assume that the Editor is editing in Good Faith. I have been, but many have simply attacked me as a spammer without considering that I provided valid info on a topic.

Please talk with me before the threats of Blocking me. I am not a spammer, just an eager User. Now, that I have joined and started posting under my User name, I have seen the True Colors of Wikipedia. My anonymous posts are still untouched somehow, but they also link to various blogs.

Please advise if I should begin posting anonymously again, since I did not have these sorts of issues before. My content and sources were considered valid then and should be considered valid now.

Thanks for listening. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Niac7 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

30000 year old fossil bones

The user John Bot has proposed on 23 April 2008 that the article ‘Human fossil bones from the Muierii Cave and the Cioclovina Cave, Romania’ should be part of Wikiproject Geology. This is inappropriate because the contribution belongs mainly to Anthropology and Archaeology. In the meantime the user John Bot has been blocked indefinitely by Wikipedia.

The contribution is about two human fossil bones having an age of 30000 years, which is the period when Homo sapiens entered Europe from the East, and therefore are very significant for the early European history. I hope you will reinstate the article.

Agata Olariu (talk) 20:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Amatae Adea

I undid your last edit to Amatae Adea. While the author was wrong to remove the speedy deletion tag when they added the content in, it was also innapropriate of you to remove all of their content. The article now has content but the article does not assert any notability for the band so I tagged it for speedy deletion under a7. If you have any questions let me know. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 14:49, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

That is one of the reasons why I stopped using Huggle. It makes it to easy to revert to a state that doesn't really belong. My suggestion is to slow down and review what the article is being reverted to. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 15:04, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

I like Twinkle. When you are looking at diffs it gives some extra links to rollback the edits. The part I like about it you actually get to see what the editor changed and I don't have to download a new program. The downside is that it only works in certain browsers. It does not work in Microsft Internet Explorer. I know it works in Google Chrome and Firefox, I think it works in Opera and Safari. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 15:17, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Editing on Palace page

Hello, I was editing the 'India' section of the Palace page because it is clear marketing from the hotel or resorts in question, with unnecessary adjectives and a non-encyclopedic tone! As I seem to be unaware of the correct protocol to do this, maybe you could do it for me. The paragraphs in question have no place on the page, I'm sure you'll agree. 195.110.90.129 (talk) 18:34, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Photo requests

Do you do photo requests?

I have two in the Barcelona area that need to be fulfilled:

• Spanair head office - Edifici Spanair. Plaça d'Europa 54-56, 08902 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat (Barcelona)
• Vueling head office - Parque de Negocios Mas Blau II Pla de l'Estany, 5 El Prat de Llobregat Barcelona 08820

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 23:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Catalan Culture Challenge

I've seen on your userpage that you speak Catalan: From March 16 to April 15 we will be organising the Catalan Culture Challenge, a Wikipedia editing contest in which victory will go to those who start and improve the greatest number of articles about 50 key figures of Catalan culture. You can take part by creating or expanding articles on these people in your native language (or any other one you speak). We look forward to seeing you! Amical Wikimedia--Kippelboy (talk) 07:15, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

February 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Amílcar Cabral International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 17:35, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Javierito92. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Javierito92. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

June 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Etihad Airways destinations. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Javierito92. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Air France Barcelona flights

Please note that Twitter is not a reliable source and it states that AF are operating flights for a convention which are ad-hoc irregular flights and those flights aren’t listed. Thanks! AddictedFlyer21 (talk) 16:03, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Special:WantedTemplates

Hi, I have been cleaning up Special:WantedTemplates and noticed that Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:"_+_"oldafdfull"_+_" is pointing to your monobook.js pages. clearly these are false positives (basically a bug in how WP parses .js pages). it would be really great if you could add
// <syntaxhighlight lang=javascript> to the top and
// </syntaxhighlight> to the bottom of those pages. by putting these tags in comments, it won't prevent the javascript from executing, but it will remove those pages from Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:"_+_"oldafdfull"_+_". alternatively, if you are no longer using the monobook skin (many people are using vector these days) and don't need to keep the old page, you could just have the page deleted. thank you in advance for your help. Frietjes (talk) 20:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)