User talk:JerzeyKosinsy

Welcome!

Hello JerzeyKosinsy! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 18:05, 11 November 2020 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Mr. Pike - I am referencing a legitimate article from an expert who put this information in a technical article on Medium.com This is not a blog, this is an article.

Can you let me know what the problem with that is?

thank you.

JerzeyKosinsy (talk) 23:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard has been reverted.
Your edit here to Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://pciguru.wordpress.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:05, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

JerzeyKosinsy (talk) 23:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --VViking_TalkEdits 14:49, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Can you please let me know what is disruptive?

This is a 100% legitimate edit.

If you feel it is not, please explain in detail.

I went to the paged you referenced and it is generic. It does not detail what my suspected violation is.

thank you.

Hello, I'm Billhpike. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Please do not add references to promote a blog. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 11:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi JerzeyKosinsy! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at RSA Conference that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 11:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Blogs as sources

Self published blogs such as the ones you have recently been citing from medium.com are not useful sources on Wikipedia. Please see WP:RS for details on what makes for a good source. Also, are you associated with Ben Rothke or with Tapad in some way? I have noticed you are citing this person quite a lot. - MrOllie (talk) 20:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

No association, just posting things I find useful.

to that, why is medium forbidden? It is a legitimate source and there are very valuable article. Why prohibit and entire web site? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JerzeyKosinsy (talk • contribs)

Because medium articles are self published, as I mentioned. Please do read the linked guideline. - MrOllie (talk) 00:01, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

April 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 22:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Please be so kind as to explain how this is disruptive editing?

And do explain how it is promotional or advertising material.

The links I am sharing are completely relevant to the topics.

Thank you.

Friday 3:30PM - hey User:Billhpike - a courtesy of a reply and explanation, would be appreciated. thanks.

Saturday 9:45PM - still waiting for clarification Bill. Please do explain, rather than just libeling me.

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:38, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

What makes you think I have an affiliation?

Please tell me SPECIFICALLY what the error is rather than a generic ‘violation’. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JerzeyKosinsy (talk • contribs)

The specific error is inappropriate promotion of Rothke through external links. - MrOllie (talk) 14:41, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Gartner, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 14:42, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

re Olly olly oxen free

re this edit, no they don't. I just listened to the official version on YouTube right now, and they don't. When corrected, you doubled down, and don't do that. If you have a source saying this, that'd be different, and if so put it in. Absent that, take it to the talk page per WP:BRD. But don't edit war. Herostratus (talk) 13:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Listen to it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-crgQGdpZR0

How could you not hear it?

Also, I did not 'double down', I provided the EXACT places in the song where they say that.

Wrong answer. That is not how it works. You have been here long enough to start learning quick that Wikipedia:Reliable sources (read it please) are needed for assertions of fact. If Dave Marsh or whomever says its, that's one thing. Your own personal interpretation of what you think you are hearing is worth nothing for our purposes. That's assuming you're not trolling, which is possible.

You need to stop making edits like that tout de suite and please read WP:BRD about how this website works. Please sign your talk page posts and intent each reply one space using the : character. Herostratus (talk) 01:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)