User talk:Joinarnold

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Perfecto 04:56, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

crossflo

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia as we drive for print or DVD publication; see the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. Perfecto 04:56, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crossflo systems

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Crossflo systems, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! --Perfecto 04:58, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crossflo

Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. —Veyklevar 06:35, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know what "bias" means?

I suggest you review the policies on biased posting and removing biased material. What you have been doing to my and other contributions on the Pete Wilson page is bordering on vandalism. You are not a judge and jury on what constitutes bias--in fact, there is a persistent pattern to your edits that displays obvious bias. You should not be removing factual information supported by references. If you disapprove of the language, improve it. If you dislike the content--tough!

This is not meant to be hagiography of Pete Wilson or anyone else. Critical materials, if accurate, should be incorporated. Please stop removing well documented and researched materials or risk a permanent block. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex.deWitte (talk • contribs) 01:59, 3 April 2010 (UTC) Sorry, forgot to add the signature--that's what bots are for. I certainly did not mean to make it anonymous. Alex.deWitte (talk) 02:06, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Will Beback talk 20:30, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Preuss School

See Talk:Preuss School#Controversies section. Will Beback talk 04:18, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Pete Wilson, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 01:34, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sculpture image of Pete Wilson

Copyright laws protect any non-architectural three-dimensional work erected in the US after 1990. The statue of Pete Wilson first appeared in public in 2007, so likely the image shall be considered non-free 3d art. I have not removed your "PD-self" tag, but that was for the photo. If you have concerns, feel free to ask and/or comment. However, please do not revert the changes I made. --George Ho (talk) 00:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Pete Wilson seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:51, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Your addition to Pete Wilson has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:24, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dan Rather reported on Reagan's support on Reagan on his news show on August 23rd, 1982.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dan Rather reported on Reagan's support on Reagan on his news show on August 23rd, 1982. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MarginalCost (talk) 22:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dan Rather reported on Reagan's support on his news show on August 23rd, 1982.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dan Rather reported on Reagan's support on his news show on August 23rd, 1982. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MarginalCost (talk) 22:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]