User talk:Jokestress/2019

Voltron: Defender Of The Universe listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Voltron: Defender Of The Universe. Since you had some involvement with the Voltron: Defender Of The Universe redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:54, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Current election for Secretary in Association of Redirectionist Wikipedians

Hi greetings, we have decided to conduct an election for General Secretary in ARW. We are inviting you for participating in election. Hope you will participate in it.

--PATH SLOPU ^(Talk) 13:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Apple Inc.

Hello Jokestress,

You've been identified either as a previous member of the project, an active editor on Apple related pages, a bearer of Apple related userboxes, or just a hoopy frood.

WikiProject Apple Inc. has unexpectedly quit, because an error type "unknown" occured. Editors must restart it! If you are interested, read the project page and sign up as a member. There's something for everyone to do, such as welcoming, sourcing, writing, copy editing, gnoming, proofreading, or feedback — but no pressure. Do what you do, but let's coordinate and stay in touch.

See the full welcome message on the talk page, or join the new IRC channel on irc.freenode.net named #wikipedia-en-appleinc ^connect. Please join, speak, and idle, and someone will read and reply.

Please spread the word, and join or unsubscribe at the subscription page.

RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} and Smuckola on behalf of WikiProject Apple Inc. - Delivered 15:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Becky-allison.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Becky-allison.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:04, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Barresi-schwarzenegger.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Barresi-schwarzenegger.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:04, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eric Barbour (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Eric Barbour (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Randykitty (talk) 13:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Why is the Sky Blue listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Why is the Sky Blue. Since you had some involvement with the Why is the Sky Blue redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 00:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

John Paul Ii listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John Paul Ii. Since you had some involvement with the John Paul Ii redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 21:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Internal Security act listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Internal Security act. Since you had some involvement with the Internal Security act redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:56, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Äpfel listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Äpfel. Since you had some involvement with the Äpfel redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 04:30, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

A Shark listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A Shark. Since you had some involvement with the A Shark redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 04:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

"Transfan" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Transfan. Since you had some involvement with the Transfan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -Crossroads- (talk) 01:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

"Transfans" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Transfans. Since you had some involvement with the Transfans redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:30, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

"Whitney Foreman" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Whitney Foreman. Since you had some involvement with the Whitney Foreman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Gonnym (talk) 20:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Wow, it's like you anticipated that 2019 psychological thriller film

When Joaquin Phoenix's character was having a hard time onstage at the comedy club, he experienced joke stress. Зенитная Самоходная Установка (talk) 22:25, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

I have more jokes and less stress, though. I chose that username 30 years ago from Шутовка - maybe you get the pun? Jokestress (talk) 19:24, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

I wanted to learn other languages, but the story of the attempts went sorta like this. I'm just too white. Зенитная Самоходная Установка (talk) 00:32, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

I was just scoping out the story of how everything went awry

I am a generalist who happens to be a notable expert on sex and gender minorities editing under her real name That was your first mistake.

I'm also known for attempting to reform Wikipedia and problematic community conduct That was your second mistake.

I had acknowledged my COI That was the last mistake you ever made.

What you're supposed to do, is hide behind anonymity and be like, "Look, I don't have a dog in the fight, but I do believe policies matter, and I noticed some biased, poorly sourced material that I sought to render more neutral," yadda yadda yadda. That puts you on an even playing field with everyone else who is saying the same thing.

The reason is, Wikipedia is very concerned with appearances, and as soon as you disclose you have some kind of personal involvement in or attachment to an issue, they're going to worry that there'll be some media article about how a certain self-serving interest group or agenda-pushing ideological faction is "taking over" Wikipedia's articles about a certain subject.

In reality, that goes on all the time, but they try to be subtler about it and hide their motives. In actuality, you could be the one who's truly seeking after neutrality and fairness, but your sincerity doesn't matter if the situation could be twisted to look bad.

Also, people don't like the idea of "reforming" Wikipedia or problematic community conduct; if you say that's your goal, they're going to say that you're the problem and that if you don't like how Wikipedia is, you should go elsewhere.

There was one particular policy mentioned in your case, I'm not gonna say which one it is, but it was enacted several years ago by the guy at the top in response to what they feared was going to blaze out of control into a more serious media conflagration, and was total window-dressing in an attempt to keep from getting on the wrong side of a moral panic, kind of like some of the YouTube censorship that was imposed this year. The establishment is pretty relentless in its attempts to get this particular dissident group from gaining a foothold anywhere, and they've mostly done a pretty good job of it, although occasionally some stuff seems to fly under their radar or they just never get around to doing anything about it. Зенитная Самоходная Установка (talk) 03:09, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Truer words were never spoken! Жребий брошен! Jokestress (talk) 05:58, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lothar Kalinowsky

The article Lothar Kalinowsky has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable via A7

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. dibbydib ^💬/_✏ 02:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

I’m shocked to see the conflation of A7 with notability policy. 2600:1003:B108:4031:B078:3F71:19BF:68BE (talk) 03:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

I apologize

Hi Jokestress, I just wanted to apologize for the Andrea/Amanda screwup at ARCA. I didn't double check when I typed the suggestion, and it came up as a blue link so I didn't realize the mistake. Thanks for having a sense of humor about it at ARCA. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

No troubles at all! It's a common mistake with my intentionally unremarkable name, as was the style for trans people at the time I chose it. Thanks for all the thoughtful deliberation over there! You can always count on my having a sense of humor, per my username >> Jokestress (talk) 19:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Arbitration motion regarding Sexology

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

Remedy 2.1 of Sexology ("Jokestress topic-banned from human sexuality") is amended to read:

Jokestress (talk · contribs) is indefinitely banned from the topic of human sexuality and gender, including biographies of people who are primarily notable for their work in these fields.

For the Arbitration Committee --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 06:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration motion regarding Sexology

Nomination of Tom Chappell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Chappell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Chappell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Kate Chappell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kate Chappell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Chappell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Incidental, accidental, edit to your User page

Greetings, User:Jokestress. Please accept my apologies for accidentally editing your User page. I had started this Wikipedia session at the Jackie Gleason page (reading up on his incidental music). That took me to the page for coronetist Bobby Hackett. A photograph there took me to the page for William P. Gottlieb. A caption of that photograph took me to the page for labor unionist Jacob Potofsky, which I spent some time making some copyedit improvements to.

Curious as to who had originated that welcome page, I went back in its history to you. I clicked on your user page to see who you were and see if I could douse out any relationship to Potofsky and got so absorbed in it I completely forgot it was a user page, and, thinking it was an actual biography at Wikipedia, reflexively added two carriage returns to create some white space in an overlong paragraph, making it more readable. It was only upon hitting return that when the page refreshed I realized it was your User page instead.

I meant no harm. Feel free to revert. The oversight, and intrusion, are mine. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 21:27, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

No problem, @Wikiuser100:! I think I'll leave it. So you know my connection, I wrote bios for everyone on both of Nixon's enemies lists, which is how I came to write the Jacob Potofsky bio. Jokestress (talk) 21:56, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

User page content

Hi, Jokestress, you've been around for many moons and don't need to be templated with uw-userpage; but surely you must have run across the guidelines for proper content on a User page by this point. If not, it's here, and says that user pages "should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content." Please pay attention to section #What may I not have in my user pages?, in particular, subsection #User pages that look like articles. You already have a WP:MAINSPACE article about you, so I don't see why you'd want to duplicate that here, anyway. Why not just wipe out your user page and start over, talk a bit about yourself in the first person if you feel like, or add some userboxen of your choice, or what the heck, have a blank user page, and just a link to your article. Your call, really; only it shouldn't remain this way, per the guideline. Thanks for your many contributions over the years, and happy editing! Mathglot (talk) 08:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, @Mathglot:. I made some changes based on your suggestions and that guideline. Jokestress (talk) 02:37, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

"Garment worker" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Garment worker. Since you had some involvement with the Garment worker redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

"Nevada-Las Vegas" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nevada-Las Vegas. Since you had some involvement with the Nevada-Las Vegas redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)