User talk:Jonny88828

August 2017

Hello, I'm Sjö. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to White Party have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 05:50, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at White Party shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sjö (talk) 08:21, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jonny88828, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jonny88828! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to White Party, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. The same goes for your removal of the disambiguation tags at the top of the article. Those are needed to help readers find the article they are looking for. Please do not remove them. Sjö (talk) 20:20, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to White Party. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 09:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jonny88828. - DVdm (talk) 10:42, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]