User talk:Jss199

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 22:55, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of the Grebbeberg because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! The Banner talk 03:13, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of the Netherlands. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. The Banner talk 03:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Hannut, you may be blocked from editing. The Banner talk 03:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint, unsourced changes[edit]

There's a big problem on Wikipedia with editors calculating their own figures and inserting them into cited specification sections, even against figures cited directly.

Since you did it twice in a short time and one more in the past, you should consider following wartime reports.

N1K1-J : http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/japan/George-107A.pdf Ki-84 : http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/japan/Ki-84-156A.pdf

Sincerely

Tajj94 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tajj94 (talk • contribs) 18:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Jss199, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to do lots more. Some useful pages to visit are:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm North Shoreman. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Hideki Tojo because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 20:21, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Hideki Tojo, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 20:28, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SECOND NOTICE[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Communist Party of the Soviet Union, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 23:02, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FINAL WARNING[edit]

You have been asked repeatedly to stop marking all of your edits as minor, yet you persist in doing so with edits that are not minor, most recently at Paris Commune. Marking all of your edits as minor is deceptive and rude to other editors. This is your final opportunity to either stop this behavior or explain yourself here on your talk page. If there is something about the idea of "minor edit" that you don't understand, please ask here and we'll do our best to explain it to you. Otherwise, the next time you inappropriately mark an edit as minor, you will likely be blocked from editing and your edit will be reverted. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:59, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Planned economy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 13:57, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Communist Party USA, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 02:12, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Proletarian Democracy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 13:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Proletarian Democracy. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 15:07, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Nazi Germany, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 13:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at No War but the Class War. Sundayclose (talk) 22:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Sedan (1940). Sundayclose (talk) 17:57, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Model of masculinity under fascist Italy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 23:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2nd Armored Division (United States), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 23:46, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a source for your edit to the Battle of the Ardennes infobox. Who gives the figure of 40,000 for the French wounded? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 21:06, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Battle of the Ardennes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 21:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 22:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As you've continued to make problematic edits without responding to any concerns, I've blocked you for 72 hours. Resumption of this behavior after your block expires will result in longer blocks. As Wikipedia as a collaborative project, not communicating is not an option. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:42, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Reach Out to the Truth 02:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Battle of Arracourt, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 03:59, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Jss199. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]