User talk:JustN5:12

MSP-MNL on NW

NWA has direct, non-plane changing service to MNL. We also list direct flights that don't require a plane change. If you like, you can go through ALL the airport articles and remove all the direct destinations yourself. I have reverted your edit and restored Manila back into the list. I was wondering why did you removed Manila as an destination in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport article and not manage to remove Minneapolis/St. Paul in the Ninoy Aquino International Airport article for Northwest Airlines. Bucs2004 05:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editors that don't provide an edit summary tend to look like vandals

I have noticed you commonly don't enter an edit summary as you didn't when you edited Denver International Airport (see this edit). This causes me problems. When I patrol for vandalism, I use the summary to make a preliminary decision on whether or not the post is a vandal edit or not. If the summary is present (or at least a section header, the part inside the /* */), I commonly decide the edit is legit and move on.

However, if no edit summary is available, I typically resort to loading the diff for the edit. This takes time. For that reason, if your edits are all valid, I ask that you provide edit summaries. For more on how to enter an edit summary, please read Help:Edit summary.

Incidentally, it is not just me that appreciate having edit summaries. When you omit your summary, you may be telling various bots that you are vandalizing pages. For this reason, please consider providing that summary. It is very important. You can enter that summary via the edit summary box on edit pages (as shown below).

The edit summary appears in black italics in the following places:

Page history - list of changes to the page you edited
User contributions - list of all your edits
Watchlist* - list of recent changes to watched pages (logged-in users only)
diff page - shows the difference between two edits
Recent changes - list of all recent edits
Wikipedia IRC channels - real time list of all edits
Related changes - list of recent changes to pages linked to the page you edited
List of new pages: shows the edit summary of the creation.

* Use the enhanced watchlist to see all recent changes in the watched pages, not just the last change in each page.

For more tips on how to avoid being mistaken for a vandal, please visit Steps You Can Take to Avoid Being Thought of as a Vandal.

Please note that your user page name (that link at the top of this page with your name) is a red link. This means you don't have an user page yet. This is also a red flag. Vandals rarely bother with an user page because they know we will get them blocked quickly. So some create accounts they expect to last only a few hours. In that case, they will skip providing a summary and creating an user page. Will (Talk - contribs) 00:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Just to let you know, you made an error in the syntax on Glacial plucking. Make sure you put the pound sign first - "#REDIRECT [[target]]" - otherwise the redirect will not work. — Swpb ^{talk contribs} 01:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UA DEN-SEA-NRT

Where are you seeing a direct no-plane-change flight DEN-SEA-NRT? I just checked the OAG timetables and United.com and came up with nada. FCYTravis 01:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure of personal information

I have noticed that your user page discloses your real name, date of birth, and state of residence. These are strongly discouraged by the guidelines at WP:KIDS and the essay Wikipedia:Youth protection. Please consider removing personally identifying information from your user page. —Dgies^t c 02:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Comment

I like your comment on the wktionaries. I totally agree. We should only have the English wiktionary on the English Wikipedia, and the french one on the french wikipedia. I have been a wikipedian for 2 months now too. I like video games. What video games to you play? --Ryan ^TALK 16:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Usually racing and shooter. JustN5:12 21:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Si/Little Si

Justin, I ran into the discussion about Little Si <--> Mount Si just by accident. I was working on the nearby Mount Washington (Cascades) article and wanted to link them in. I will try to find the proper references to back-up my statements about the merits of each of the two mountains. I live in North Bend, so I have to separate folk lore from documentable facts. I hope you like the new picture I took this morning to show you the distinct fault break that separates Little Si from Mount Si. As a matter of fact, the hiking trail to the top of Little Si goes right through the slot and then around the back to get to the top. I've hiked it with my kids. Best wishes from North Bend. Kgrr 03:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

so can we remove the merge request from Mount Si??? Kgrr 00:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do it! JustN5:12 00:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not erase articles

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Square root day. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DavidCBryant 11:13, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I admit some screwing around, and it will not happen again. However, it must also be noted that all of those articles were already in the process of deletion. Over the last three months in Wikipedia, I have been doing just straight up editing, some that might not have made sense but made a point I had, while the majority of them were either correcting major mistakes or considering that this and that should be merged. Down the road, you shouldn't see anymore of this ridiculous mumbo jumbo from me. JustN5:12 00:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a forum

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:iTunes are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. Please refrain from doing this in the future. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you! --esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 01:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use talk pages such as Roller Coaster Tycoon 3 for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. Camaron1 | Chris 10:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wassup?

hey wassup man? hey i read ur comment, but im worried about the graphic card i use

an nVidia GeForce 7300GT 512MB DDR2 128bit

I don´t know if this baby can run cool games, like test drive, prey or call of duty. U think i should change the card for a newer one?!?!?!?Big butt gangsta 02:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not doing bad, Big butt gangsta (heh)! Well, I can easily answer this question based off a similar question I also posted on the Test Drive Unlimited talk page. The other guy said that he had just bought the game (which works perfectly) with:

CPU: AMD64 3000+
Video: NVIDIA GeForce 7800GS
RAM: 2GB

Note the similarity between your video card and his. Also, look at the requirements of the game on the main article and compare them to what is listed here along with what you have. So my answer to your main question is-no, you do not need to get a different video card, yours should work fine. Take care! JustN5:12 02:53, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Atlantic Records, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ._-zro ^t_c 03:16, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 6 weeks. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.6 weeksInfrogmation 03:19, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a while

I haven't edited Wikipedia for quite awhile now, but I'm back for my next what-I-call "EDITING PERIOD." I've been getting a little more of a life outside of Wikipedia, which I still will. JustN5:12 (talk) 00:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning before longer block

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Canada, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandalizing pages, as you did Finger (gesture). -- GoodDay (talk) 23:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 3 months as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JustN5:12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't actually SAVE my edits!

Decline reason:

Yes, you did. As your contributions show. Step hen 09:47, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Alright, I acknowledge that I was messing around, but I never actually pressed the "save page" button. They might've been autosaved. JustN5:12 (talk) 19:46, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These two edits hardly seem productive to me... care to explain why you made them? – Luna Santin (talk) 06:22, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WHADDAFUCK YA GONNA DO TO ME, HUH BITCH!????????? JustN5:12 (talk) 05:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So that I could be funny! Bite me!!!JustN5:12 (talk) 01:01, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Consider yourself bitten. Infrogmation (talk) 06:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(see: block log · contributions · current autoblocks)

BITE ME AGAIN MOTHERFUCKER! I FUCKED YOUR BITCH!!! I KNOW IT'S BEEN OVER A YEAR NOW!! JustN5:12 (talk)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JustN5:12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

CAUSE I SAID SO YOU FAT MUTHAFUCKA!!!!! YO YO YO...IT BEEN OVER A YEAR NOW SINCE I LAST GONE WENT ON DIS PAGE...YOU GONNA UNBLOCK ME NOW MUTHAFUCKA...AND BY THE WAY, I FUCKED YO BITCH'S PUSSY POONANY!

Decline reason:

Your ability to edit this page has now been revoked. Have a nice day. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 06:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.