User talk:Keneckert
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
A beer for you!
[edit]Thanks for helping out with Sendler's article! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:06, 30 April 2015 (UTC) |
Truro
[edit]Hi, I've undone your edit to Truro - it seems you've accidentally edited the wrong Truro! The one with the pieces of the Berlin Wall is Truro, Nova Scotia. Best wishes, DuncanHill (talk) 11:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
--Ah, that was careless of me. Thank you for catching it. I'll add it to the correct Truro. - Ken Eckert
Disambiguation link notification for July 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trail Airport, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nelson and Castlegar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
-- I've added better links to the towns. I hope this is better. Thanks. Ken ~
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Keneckert. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Seoullo 7017 Skypark
[edit]On 18 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Seoullo 7017 Skypark, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Seoul has a new elevated park, Seoullo 7017 Skypark (pictured), converted from a disused overpass? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Seoullo 7017 Skypark. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Seoullo 7017 Skypark), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Very cool. I'm honored. Thank you. Keneckert (talk) 09:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)keneckert
Move review
[edit]An editor has asked for a Move review of Grand Duchy of Kraków. Because you participated in the requested move, you might want to participate in the move review. Academicoffee71 (talk) 05:05, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Keneckert. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Keneckert. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Query
[edit]Were you solicited/contacted to !vote in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heaven for the nobles, Purgatory for the townspeople, Hell for the peasants, and Paradise for the Jews, specifically this diff ? I am asking, since this is the second AfD you have voted on (the previous one being in 13:11, 21 June 2017) and this coming after a fairly long wikibreak (from April 2018). If you were contacted regarding the AfD, please state so clearly in the discussion. Icewhiz (talk) 13:48, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Move review: Paradisus Judaeorum
[edit](sent out exact copy to all AfD participants - apologize if you are aware) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heaven for the nobles, Purgatory for the townspeople, Hell for the peasants, and Paradise for the Jews which you were involved in, is in discussion at Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2018 December. Input there is welcome.Icewhiz (talk) 07:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Note regarding interactions with colleagues' accounts
[edit]Hi, Keneckert. My name is Tamzin, and I'm a sockpuppet investigations clerk here, meaning I look into cases where multiple accounts may have been used inappropriately. We recently received a complaint about your interactions with user Piotrus (courtesy ping). That complaint seems largely overblown, and I've blocked the complaining party as a sockpuppet themself, but I do see a need to bring your attention to this policy section. I am not accusing either of you or any wrongdoing—and am only writing to you, as I see no evidence Piotrus had any awareness of any of this—but you do seem to have backed Piotrus up on several occasions, and are an off-wiki colleague of his, which is cause for some alarm under that policy. I do see that in at least one past discussion you've disclosed this connection; in the future, I would encourage you to do so consistently, keeping in mind the provision Sanctions have been applied to editors of longer standing who have not, in the opinion of Wikipedia's administrative bodies, consistently exercised independent judgment.
All the best. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 19:18, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Tamzin. Tamzin, I am a work colleague of Piotrus and have met him, and am an occasional contributor to Wikipedia as well. News spreads fairly rapidly through the grapevine of our university regarding other international faculty. If you feel that I should edit my comment to disclose that I do know Piotrus, I will do so. My apologies. Ken Keneckert (talk) 00:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking interest in this, Ken, and your kind words. I would prefer to make it to the news under a bit better circumstances, though. Let's catch up some time! Ps. For my side of the story, please see here. For coverage by the Wikipedia's own newspaper known as The Signpost, see here. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
World War II and the history of Jews in Poland: Arbitration case opened
[edit]Hello Keneckert,
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 04, 2023, which is when the first evidence phase closes. Submitted evidence will be summarized by Arbitrators and Clerks at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Evidence/Summary. Owing to the summary style, editors are encouraged to submit evidence in small chunks sooner rather than more complete evidence later.
Details about the summary page, the two phases of evidence, a timeline and other answers to frequently asked questions can be found at the case's FAQ page.
For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)