User talk:Kittylover0000000000

Welcome!

Hello, Kittylover0000000000, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 16:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm HCA. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Claw because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! HCA (talk) 18:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Crag. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Crag was changed by Kittylover0000000000 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866152 on 2013-09-01T20:07:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The information you keep trying to add is of no value at all, not in an encyclopedia. Please refrain. Drmies (talk) 20:09, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Crag. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVdm (talk) 20:13, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Claw. DVdm (talk) 20:15, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 20:20, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kittylover0000000000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

wrongly accused for vandalisam

Decline reason:

Per below. I would also recommend this user consider changing their username after any unblock as that's a few too many zeroes to remember the exact number. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ggirl 20:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

You weren't accused of vandalisam, but of disruptive editing. Perhaps you can look at the many talk page messages and the edit summaries of those who reverted you to see what's going on. Drmies (talk) 23:19, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]