User talk:Klingon83
September 2008
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Hagen Rether has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\byoutube\.com' (link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpprNYjQjnw) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 17:07, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Stub template on user page
[edit]Hi Klingon83. I hope you don't mind that I subst'ed the stub template on your user page and removed the category link; I did this so that your page doesn't turn up in a category of articles for editors to expand (only articles are supposed to be stubs). Grutness...wha? 23:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Grutness, and thanks, I'm fine with your changes. Generally, I don't mind anyone providing facts about me (i.e., about --Klingon83 (talk)) that I maybe didn't realize before - eventually I might end up learning something new about myself... ;-) --Klingon83 (talk) 09:40, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/35/Information_icon.svg/62px-Information_icon.svg.png)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Rundkirche Zum Friedefürsten (Klingenthal), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Rundkirche Zum Friedefürsten (Klingenthal) is a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project (CSD A2).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Rundkirche Zum Friedefürsten (Klingenthal), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:10, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Well, there Rundkirche Zum Friedefürsten we have it again. I generally disapprove of "translation" as a reason for speedy deletion - but thanks for the heads-up anyway. ;) --Klingon83 (talk) 14:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- EDIT + UPDATE: I'm sorry for my detachment and non-responsiveness back then. I'm sure the article could have been saved or improved, but it was a busy year, 2016. Maybe I'll bother to rewrite it from scratch some day – if someone beats me to it, I'll be glad to see it. ^_^ --Klingon83 (talk) 20:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Article assessments
[edit]Just a quick note that I assessed Vogtland per your request. Feel free to make such kind of assessments yourself by altering the banner. From Stub to Start is quite easy to spot after that you will need to know more about the criteria. Beyond B it is never just a single person rating the article. PS. just adding a category like you did here does not work. Agathoclea (talk) 12:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot - I just didn't know (and don't know yet) how to change the banner. Sure I will learn... ;-) --Klingon83 (talk) 12:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
East Germany
[edit]...basically (diff) these headings reflect personal views not supported by the text. See WP:SYNTHESIS and WP:OR and perhaps WP:NPOV. Rd232 talk 16:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I see. I will take these rules into account and think it over - we had loads of that in history classes and I know lots more about East German history to feel confident about this; just a pity, that I would have to publish a thesis about this in proprietarian media, before I could be posting it again on WP... ;-) Thanks for these links! --Klingon83 (talk) 18:27, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited American Studies Leipzig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gymnasium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Remove? Not at all - thank you, @ DPL Bot! ;-) --Klingon83 (talk) 00:23, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Klingenthal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Max Hess (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Klingon83. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Klingon83. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Klingon83. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Vogtland
[edit]Hi. I've left you a message over on Welsh Wikipedia. Deb (talk) 07:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi; I've been busy, so there's where the delay comes from. I will try to expand and improve that there article ASAP, but as yet, my Welsh still needs quite a bit of improvement. It's a work in progress, both the language and the article; so whoever happens over the article or reads these lines and has a bit of Cymraeg, thanks in advance for your glance, advice and contributions! --Klingon83 (talk) 20:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Regional and minority Languages in Europe
[edit]Hello, Klingon83,
Thank you for creating Regional and minority Languages in Europe.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please change the names of the countries to their English names where appropriate (Romania, Croatia)
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
JW 1961 Talk 19:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Many thanks for the kind advice! :) --Klingon83 (talk) 20:18, 14 June 2021 (UTC)