Hello, Kotobagaari! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horsesIf you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:42, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Kotobagaari, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
Hi Kotobagaari! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)
I think we're both trying to achieve a more NPOV article, but going about it different ways, and that could quickly escalate into an edit war, which I think we both want to avoid.
It is not Wikipedia's job to take sides in ecclesiastical battles, and I think that some could interpret your edits as siding with The Episcopal Church, and mine as siding with the autonomous diocese. Assuming good faith, I believe we both want to present the data fairly, rather than take one side of the debate as true.
To that end, I suggest we make the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina page ambiguous, with both competing bishops listed along with their legally contested status, and redirect readers to a separate article for both the autonomous diocese (which I will make, titled Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina (autonomous) and the Episcopal Church diocese (which already has a page).
Sound good to you?
Peace, --Wikibojopayne (talk) 00:44, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps complicating the issue, but also seeking neutrality and fairness, I proposed the new "autonomous" article for deletion. I hope that hasn't made this harder to resolve. The reason I did this is explained on the talk page. Kotobagaari, instead of just editing, could you maybe explain what you're trying to do on the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina talk page? Thanks! Dunncon13 (talk) 17:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
