User talk:Krystofia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unreferenced, with no evidence of notability. Lists (without citing) only one source, namely the person's own website.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Krystofia/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:09, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Krystofia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:09, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple copies

Hi, can you please stop creating multiple copies of your draft. You now have both User:Krystofia/sandbox and Draft:Alexandre Lessertisseur in the system. Creating duplicates doesn't increase the chances of the draft being accepted, it only causes confusion and extra work for reviewers and admins. Please blank the latter draft, so that it can be deleted, and your sandbox draft (now twice reviewed) moved into its place.

Also, please don't post article/draft content into your user page or user talk page (I've just deleted both), or indeed anywhere else other than the intended article/draft. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:17, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The citations seem to have been taken from the fr.wiki original, and some of them don't render correctly on en.wiki; also, some citations are empty. Please correct them, so that the sources can be verified.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Krystofia/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:23, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Alexandre Lessertisseur, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please make further edits to the copy in draft space rather than resubmitting this sandbox.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Krystofia/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:12, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Star Mississippi was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: You have been requested to edit the draft article. No further edits to this copy will be considered.

Star Mississippi 18:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lessertisseur Alexandre

The article Lessertisseur Alexandre has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Waddles 🗩 🖉 22:53, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lessertisseur Alexandre moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lessertisseur Alexandre, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Star Mississippi 23:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop creating multiple articles about Alexandre Lessertisseur . You may edit Draft:Alexandre Lessertisseur. If you continue to create multple versions, you will be blocked. Star Mississippi 23:15, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Lessertisseur Alexandre, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. His name is Alexandre Lessertisseur. Do not switch his names to game the system. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:29, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Alexandre Lessertisseur, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Krystofia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Krystofia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

(This page should not be speedily deleted because... this article is a tradiction that I try to make of the french version of https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandre_Lessertisseur#:~:text=Alexandre%20Lessertisseur%20is%20a%20composer,France%20and%20in%20the%20world. So I'm not plagiarizing anything. I just want to have some advice to improve it ) --Krystofia (talk) 05:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are rules for what user pages may and may not contain (see WP:UP); yours looked like an article (not allowed), and contained a large volume of information not related to Wikipedia or your activities as an editor (ditto). If you wish to develop article content, you should do so in your sandbox or other user space page, or in the draft space. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I recreated the translation in my sandbox. Then I could use it now Krystofia (talk) 06:48, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your sandbox will not be accepted at AfC. Please use the draft article and stop creating multiple copies or you will be blocked. Star Mississippi 12:22, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Connection?

What, if anything, is your connection to Kaprysky? Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very close to blocking both as promotional SPAs @DoubleGrazing Star Mississippi 14:16, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alexandre Lessertisseur

Hello, Krystofia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alexandre Lessertisseur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alexandre Lessertisseur

Hello, Krystofia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alexandre Lessertisseur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]