User talk:KunoxTxa

get a life would you, stop vandalizing the Armenian pages. How old are you 5? Ninetoyadome (talk) 03:21, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninetoyadome (talk • contribs) 03:22, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Alashkert Martuni was changed by KunoxTxa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954815 on 2012-08-29T04:49:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:49, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KunoxTxa, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi KunoxTxa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:32, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Real Madrid C.F. because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mattythewhite (talk) 22:16, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Real Madrid C.F.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:26, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More to the point, we base our rosters on reliable sources. In the case of Real Madrid, on their roster and news stories. If you have a new item that adds "David Hakobyan" to the club and removes Sami Khedira from it, then add it in the edit summary. Until then, we must assume that you are not editing in good faith. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fegor Ogude

Hi there. What is your source that Fegor Ogude has signed for FC Mika? I've reverted your change, but if you can provide a reliable source, feel free to undo me. Cheers, Mentoz86 (talk) 12:01, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fegor Ogude

Hi there. What is your source that Fegor Ogude has signed for FC Mika? I've reverted your change, but if you can provide a reliable source, feel free to undo me. Cheers, Mentoz86 (talk) 12:01, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:10, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KunoxTxa, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Way2veers 21:37, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:47, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KunoxTxa, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

—MRD2014 (formerly Qpalzmmzlapq) T C 16:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KunoxTxa, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

—MRD2014 (formerly Qpalzmmzlapq) T C 17:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]