Kyle Lodge, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
Hi Kyle Lodge! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).
Your recent editing history at Linkin Park shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 12:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kyle Lodge, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Hi Kyle Lodge. The reason you received the notice above was because your recent edit to Linkin Park continued a similar pattern of editing by another editor, ML&LR1998VGCP. If Kyle Lodge asked you to make this edit, please be aware that such behavior is considered improper under Wikipedia's sock puppetry policy, as it is often difficult to tell the difference between multiple users working together and a single user abusing multiple accounts to create an illusion of support. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 22:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Kyle Lodge. You've been warned per the outcome of the edit warring complaint. When people disagree, they are expect to discuss the issue and not just keep reverting. See WP:Edit warring. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 23:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spike Wilbury (talk) 02:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spike Wilbury (talk) 12:52, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you keep doing it after this block expires, the next one is going to be indefinite.y --Spike Wilbury (talk) 12:53, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spike Wilbury (talk) 10:30, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Only indefinite because you have utterly failed to discuss or even acknowledge that you are making disruptive edits against consensus. Any admin may consider unblocking you after some discussion. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 10:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Linkin Park, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 05:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kyle_Lodge reported by User:Jd22292 (Result: ). Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 15:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Mudcrutch.
