User talk:LFC99

January 2015

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Andy Carroll because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mattythewhite (talk) 20:58, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maury Povich. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Maury Povich was changed by LFC99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914585 on 2015-01-20T18:05:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:05, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Maury Povich, you may be blocked from editing. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 00:55, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dominic Solanke, you may be blocked from editing. Widr (talk) 15:48, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Widr (talk) 15:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:17, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Daniel Sturridge. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:53, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Melissa Fumero has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Melissa Fumero was changed by LFC99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942339 on 2015-02-07T11:33:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Live updates

Hi, Live updates is not allowed per Wikipedia:WikiProject Football consensus and WP:LIVESCORES. All such edits may be removed. Please wait until matches has finished before updating stats. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 20:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I said wait until after match. QED237 (talk) 20:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Juan Cuadrado has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Juan Cuadrado was changed by LFC99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92774 on 2015-02-21T20:39:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Roberto Soldado. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tmol42 (talk) 21:26, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Dejan Lovren. QED237 (talk) 21:34, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:Qed237, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. QED237 (talk) 16:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a week for persistent unsourced changes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2014–15 Premier League. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Dont leave broken tables, and unsourced edits. QED237 (talk) 17:07, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]