User talk:LJ Holden/November 2006 - August 2007

Thanks re. Mike Moore

Cheers Lewis for bringing your Wikipedia skills to the recent edits of the Mike Moore page, fyi I have now added info to my user page Southerncrossnz

Thanks

For the nice job on the CYFS entry page. It needed a good clean up since it was being used as a recepticle for National Party press releases instead of a semi-informative entry.

Hello

Hey mate! I love your new tables I'm seeing round the Locomotives of New Zealand articles. They are a real nice contribution, and helps keep up on the current status on the stock.--GCFreak2 05:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Your guides

I was just looking at some Year Tens Politics Social Studies work, and to be dismay, your site has been cited as a source! (Mainly your guides, but on kid had a bit about Republicanism) Brian | (Talk) 23:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Colin James article

Hi there. I just noticed that the article you started on Colin James (journalist) with this edit appears to be copied verbatim from the bottom of his official website. Unless you had permission for copying the text, this was a violation of copyright. You may use web pages as sources, but the text may not be copied exactly—in the future, can you please write articles in your own words?

I've removed the text, and unfortunately the article is now quite empty. If you have time to re-add important facts using your own words, that would be great. :) -- SCZenz 09:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Key

I was looking for one as well :). I would suggest that [1] be used, as its a 'offical' photo that appears to be for release, until a free one can be found Brian | (Talk) 03:35, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Asset

Interesting line in the Cabinet Manual "the Queen and Governor-General...may assent - or not - to Bills passed through the House" Brian | (Talk) 03:46, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:John key.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:John key.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 11:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

RCES

Thought you might be interested to know that the Royal Commission on the Electoral System's report is now available online at http://www.elections.org.nz/royal-commission-report-1986.html --Midnighttonight (rendezvous) 21:55, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Well!

Congratulations and good luck. Hope to see a republic down there in the south in the next decade, personally. ;) —Nightstallion (?) 15:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry, he will have a lot of competition :) Brian | (Talk) 22:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

We'll see, we'll see. :) —Nightstallion (?) 23:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Nightstallion. It'll probably reduce my Wiki-editing time though. --Lholden 22:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, there can't only be good sides. Good luck, once more! —Nightstallion (?) 17:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Good luck and well done. Any idea as to when you'll achieve your aim? --Midnighttonight (rendezvous) 01:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Midnight: in about 2 or 3 century's :) Brian | (Talk) 02:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, that depends on a number of factors... one of them being whether or not the ALP wins the next election in Aussie, and their leader commits to a new republic process (which I think is likely if a Rudd-led Labor govt lasts more than one term). More than likely the Aussie republicans would suceed second time around if the multiple plebicites model is used (as proposed by Howard in 1998, ironically), as they won't be as divided as they were back in '99. If Locke's Bill is drawn here we may see it go to a referendum, but I don't expect NZ Labour to push the issue so long as they're still a minority govt. The Nats won't as most of their liberal conservative (and republican leaning) MPs are silent on the issue, whereas reactionary conservatives like to make lots of noise about it. Beyond that... who knows. Bolger said in 94 he thought NZ would become a republic by 2000, and he was very wrong about that (sadly). --Lholden 02:17, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand/governments

Hey Lewis, given that Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand/governments has been set up (well, kinda), would you still have copies of your guide to Prime Ministers that was on your website? I can't seem to find them at the moment. Cheers, --Midnighttonight (rendezvous) 02:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay, cool. Well, hope you can help on working on the governments. --Midnighttonight (rendezvous) 02:31, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

That looks like what is being aimed at. I am about to have a scavenge around to see what is being included in other country's articles. --Midnighttonight (rendezvous) 02:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

New Zealand constitutional crisis, 1984

I've put a snippet about this article up for DYK at Template_talk:Did_you_know#January_22. My wording is a bit clumsy; feel free to improve it.-gadfium 02:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Star times logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Star times logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 21:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Random Smiley Award

For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

--TomasBat (Talk) 23:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Party colors

Hello, I noticed that you reverted my color changes to New Zealand general election, 2008. However, the colors are visually distracting and ugly (to be frank). Certainly you have been putting much more work into the article than I have, but I would appreciate if you consider other options... Perhaps color the party names their accurate colors, but soften up the rest of the table? Any other suggestions would be appreciated... sorry for any inconvenience, and thanks. Gracenotes^T § 03:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

New Zealand Bill of Rights Act

An anon has suggested that section 4 of the Act has a meaning exactly opposite to that given in the Wikipedia article. My lay reading of the Act suggests that they're right. Could you please respond to the issue at Talk:New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, and tidy the article as necessary.-gadfium 20:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

The undo button

Please be careful using the undo button, and check the article page history afterwards. Undo only operates on a single edit, and a vandal often makes several consecutive edits to an article. An example is the vandalism of New Zealand around noon today. Because you are a well known and respected editor, any article for which you are the most recent editor will get less priority when I check my watchlist, and so any vandalism you have missed is less likely to be noticed by me. I would imagine many other editors, consciously or otherwise, use similar reasoning when checking articles for vandalism.-gadfium 01:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Flags

I suggest you take a break to read Wikipedia:Don't overuse flags. Hesperian 04:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Passenger train edits and so forth

It seems that anonymous user has taken a hint on the matter of whether or not the train names should be italicised. I agree, though - if they return to make the changes again, some sort of rule really should be invoked because this borders on thorough silliness. It adds nothing to the article, and in some cases was completely illogical.

For a little while, I've thought of more firmly establishing some style guidelines for NZR articles, and this incident has prompted to me to start a very rough draft for an NZR Manual of Style. I initially didn't think it was required by any means, especially as the only really contestable issue, that of how to properly write class names like DA and A^B, was essentially defined in the main Locomotives of NZ article. However, I'm now thinking some more broad guidelines would be helpful, especially as the group of NZR editors is expanding. As one of the well-established members of the group, what do you think? - Axver 08:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Righto. I'll aim to post a draft of the style guide later today for consideration and comments, or perhaps tomorrow if I get busy. I'll let you know when it's up. - Axver 00:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Alright, here's my rough draft: User:Axver/NZRMoS. It's not really complete, but it's late and I'm tired. Plus, it's pretty comprehensive as it is and addresses some current issues. I'd like to hear your thoughts. One part that could cause trouble is my stipulation that New Zealand has railway stations, not train stations (I certainly find the former to be far more natural terminology and it shows up with much greater regularity in text sources), as the vast majority of Auckland and Wellington station articles are currently named "Wherever Train Station". If we do adopt a policy of favouring "railway station", I feel sorry for whoever gets stuck with the task of fixing all the redirects. - Axver 15:07, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

DM, EM, ADK, and ADL class page titles

Hey there,

You'd think that I would've noticed beforehand, but I just realised that these four classes are at "NZR xx class (Diesel/Electric Multiple Unit)" rather than simply "NZR xx class". I checked the history and saw that you created three of these pages and moved the fourth to its current name. I was going to move these four pages to "NZR xx class" to conform with standard practice, but as you're someone familiar with the standard practice, I thought I would ask first to see if there is actually a reason why these four classes have Diesel or Electric Multiple Unit in brackets in the title. I'll leave the pages alone if there's a good reason.

By the way, any thoughts on the proposed Manual of Style linked from my last comment? - Axver 10:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

• I don't see why ADK and ADL should have (Diesel Multiple Unit) in them as they are non standard NZR classifications and not likely to be used again. I can see why DM and EM though.--GCFreak2 05:41, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Johnkey.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Johnkey.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

American River Touring Association

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article American River Touring Association, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 19:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Don Brash Anglican

Just touching up Don Brash article, noticed the info-box says he is Anglican, and you put the info box in there. Just wondering how you know he's Anglican, if you have a source for it. I know his father was a notable Presbyterian leader - just wrote an article on him. Just want to make sure you know for a fact Don is Anglican, and can reference it. Cheers.A.J.Chesswas 12:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Nz rly.gif listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Nz rly.gif has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[2][3]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 20:23, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

20:23, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Transport in Auckland

Hello Lholden. When you move text into a new article from an old one, please make sure that you do not remove the 'base' reference for other, left-behind sub-references, as happened during the creation of Public transport in Auckland. Cheers, MadMaxDog 10:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

John Key image

We now have a free image of John Key, although one of lower quality than the one you obtained. Accordingly, the Image:Johnkey.jpg is nominated for deletion as a replaced fair use image. Please contact Francis Till at the Leader of the Opposition's office to see if this image can be put under a free licence. It may help to point out that the Helen Clark image was released under GFDL by the office of the prime minister. -gadfium 20:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

We might have to get that back, since it appears that the so called ‘free image” was not free. Do you still have a copy of the photo that was released? Brian | (Talk) 04:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Johnkey.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Johnkey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 15:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

What did happen to the free image? Any reason why I shouldn't just undelete the fair use one?-gadfium 08:56, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Why did we lose the free image. If I undelete the fair use one, I'd like to be able to explain that it was deleted because we thought we had a free one, but ... -gadfium 19:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Route maps

Hey, thanks for letting me know about the route maps. Those look like a really good idea, so I'll have to learn how to do them too. I'd like to see them appear on the branch line articles to flesh them out a bit more (not that anyone else probably reads those pages, but it's my area of fascination!).

I've also thought it would be a good idea, at least for major routes, to have maps of New Zealand with the route's path displayed, much like how some articles on New Zealand rivers show its course from headwaters to mouth. I can imagine this would be an especially useful illustration for the ECMT to display the differences between the pre-Kaimai Tunnel and current routes. I just haven't the foggiest clue how to go about making such images. - Axver 13:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Rail transport (Auckland)

Hi. I have reinserted the section you deleted, qualified in the way you noted. However, could you please give the source you used when you deleted this, so that instead of removing it, we could source it? MadMaxDog 01:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Any comments?

I see you have made several changes to Military history of New Zealand, I take this to mean you are interested in this subject and I was wondering what your views were on my suggestion on its talk page.Blacksmith2 ^talk 05:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Wellington and Wellington Region merger

if you're reading this message, it's because you're a person who has edited either of the Wellington articles. This is a courtesy note to let you know that I proposed a merger between the two pages, and we need to know your opinion. Kripto 22:23, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Auckland Meetup - 11 August 2007 1pm

You are invited to Auckland Meetup 3 on the afternoon of Saturday 11 August 2007 at Ironique in Mt Eden. Please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland 3 for details. You can also watch Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland to be informed of future NZ meetups. Linnah 22:30, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Republican Referendum 1999 in Australian external territories and self-determination referendum 1984 on Cocos (Keeling) Islands

Dear Mr. Holden! 

I sent these questions to User:Nightstallion just few minutes ago. He couldn’t answer my questions and he proposed me to request to you. What I do now. I’m a novice in Wikipedia, but I noticed that you are a strong republican as well as me. I see that you know too much information, that you can help to answer to my questions. I have many questions to you on this issue, and I think that if you don’t know answers now, it will be interest to find them and for yourself too. Now I ask you two questions. 1. How voted inhabitants of external Australian territories: islanders of Cocos (Keeling) Islands, Christmas Island and Norfolk Island on Republican referenda in Australia on November 6th, 1999? How many people voted for Republic (and in per cents too), and how many - against? 2. What options was included in the questions of referenda on Cocos (Keeling) Islands on self-determination on April 6th, 1984 (Independence, part of Australia, dependent territory of Australia, anybody else)? How islanders voted? How many people voted for any option (and in per cents too)? If you can’t answer to me right now, please give me references if you know.

--User:212.98.173.13322:10 30.07.2007 (UTC)

Hi there. I don't have these results, but AEC has the most comprehensive results. --Lholden 22:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Republicans-nz.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Republicans-nz.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Ways of current dominions (Commonwealth realms) to Republic

Do you can to say me, the range of inevitable difficulties, what must to overcome for became a dominion (Commonwealth realm) a Republic. It is possible to allocate all of 15 countries on following range (as I know) according to complexity:

1. Light level: Belize, Antigua, Saint Vincent, Saint Lucia and Saint Kitts and Nevis. There enough a decision of Parliament by easy majority (even non constitutional majority) for each of these countries to became a Republic.

2. Medium level: Tuvalu, Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Grenada, Bahamas, Barbados, Jamaica and New Zealand. Each country must hold a referendum and then by majority of votes it can become a Republic.

3. High level: Australian Union. Majority of voters must to vote for Republic on all-country level and Republicans must to win in majority of states for Australia to become a Republic.

4. Extra high level: Canada. Need referendum. Each province must to approve the results of referendum if republicans win.

Please, correct me, if I wrong.

--User:212.98.173.133 21:40 04.08.2007 (UTC)

Lewis, I'll just cut in here. New Zealand does not need a referendum, a simple Parliamentary majority will do Brian | (Talk) 22:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

OK. Thanks! --User:212.98.173.133 21:55 03.08.2007 (UTC)

Arguably yes, because of our unwritten constitution (cf New Zealand Constitution Act 1986). However, in the opinion of Lord Cooke of Thorndon, a referendum would be required. --Lholden 00:58, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Today I sent on your e-mail Road Map --User:212.98.173.133 00:15 10.08.2007 (UTC)

To my email>?--Lholden 00:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

To holdenrepublic@REM-VEgmail.com --User:212.98.173.133 9:55 10.08.2007 (UTC)

Oh good. Just take out the "REM-VE" bit. --Lholden 10:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Not Again

Hey Lewis! ArmchairVexillologistDon has started the whole Dominion of NZ debate again. Sigh, in case your interested Talk:Commonwealth_Realm#Comment.2FDiscussion Brian | (Talk) 10:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)