User talk:Leda47

Hello, I'm an art historian from Berlin and just starting to write articles for wikipedia. I created the pages of those three and I'm wondering why the articles should miss the guidelines. All three artists are well-known and made an important impact to the society and are well recognized. Please let me know how to proceed in writing for wikipedia. Best wishes, Leda47 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.190.26.223 (talk) 16:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, it's been quite a while that I created the sites on Thorsten Goldberg, Elmar Hess, Susanne Kessler. How long will the proceedings take to be valid of verifiability? Best wishes, Leda47

Thorsten Goldberg, Elmar Hess, Susanne Kessler

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. --bender235 (talk) 17:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm an art historian from Berlin and just starting to write articles for wikipedia. I created the pages of those three and I'm wondering why the articles should miss the guidelines. All three artists are well-known and made an important impact to the society and are well recognized. Please let me know how to proceed in writing for wikipedia. Best wishes, Leda47

Nomination of Susanne Kessler for deletion

The article Susanne Kessler is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susanne Kessler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bender235 (talk) 18:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I now put some more links to the article containing more english and american content. The German version was accepted, so I try to find out what is still be missing. Any advice would be appreciated.--Leda47 (talk) 12:16, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice! Will keep it in mind. Best--Leda47 (talk) 12:14, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susanne Kessler. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. freshacconci talktalk 14:15, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Freshacconci, could you pls specify what I should refrain. The article about Susanne Kessler ist incubated and I can't understand why and how I should proceed to clarify or proove. Any help is appreciated. THX!!!Leda47 (talk) 14:28, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion for deletion is closed. The page clearly says "No further edits should be made to this page". You removed that statement and then proceeded to add commentary to the page. This clearly indicates that you understood that you were not to add anything more to that page. Therefore you were being disruptive. There is a link right on the page to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Susanne Kessler. freshacconci talktalk 14:34, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that!!! Who can modify this template's "status" parameter and move it back into articlespace? Leda47 (talk) 14:57, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the status to evaluation, meaning an uninvolved editor will look at it and see if it is ready to go into the mainspace. Anyone can change the status but I realize the instructions are confusing. I had to read them over myself a few times to understand what had to be done. In any case, it's now on to the next step. You can still edit the article while it's in the incubator if you feel more improvements are needed. Other than that, you just need to wait. freshacconci talktalk 15:18, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your help!!! I'll try to be patient ;-)Leda47 (talk) 21:22, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/André Wagner.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 22:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/André Wagner concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/André Wagner, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:27, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission André Wagner

Hello Leda47. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled André Wagner.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/André Wagner}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hasteur (talk) 23:39, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hasteur.

Thank you for your note. I was busy the last time and couln't check my articles. I'd appreciate any advice how to proceed as I don't understand what is to be done. It seems that the article has already been deleted. Thanking you and best regards Leda47 (talk) 13:41, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright warning

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages to Nicole Loeser. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages to Nicole Loeser. While translation is welcome, this translation appears to be poor quality or machine translation. Wikipedia consensus is that an unedited machine translation, left as a Wikipedia article, is worse than nothing. Please only translate pages when you understand both languages; for more guidance, see Help:Translation. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:31, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Loeser moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nicole Loeser, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 07:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nicole Loeser

Hello, Leda47. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nicole Loeser, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nicole Loeser

Hello, Leda47. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nicole Loeser".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:13, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]