User talk:Lolijij

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

The Bittles

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Bittles, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thefullwiki.org/The_Bittles.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation(s)

Your contributions are appreciated. You are very welcome here. But, I have encountered possible copyright violation(s). Some or all of the content you added in a recent edit to The Bittles appears to be copy pasted. I have deleted the article. Please feel free to start it again

Please remember that you must write in your own words. We cannot copy and paste from other websites. If I have made an error, please accept my apologies.

For further information, please read Wikipedia:Copyright violations. If you have questions, please ask. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bittles

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Bittles, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thefullwiki.org/The_Bittles.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bittles

You created it again, again by copy pasting content from a copyrighted site. You also uploaded a copyrighted image as your own. If you persist with these copyright violations, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image uploads

You can upload TV show logos to Wikipedia, not Wikicommons. Use the license as seen in this example. Let me know if you need help. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I keep removing them from the article and you keep putting them back. Please upload new versions to Wikipedia. Please do not use the Wikicommons images you uploaded. They will soon be deleted. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Edthesock.jpg looks good! Nice pic! :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Award

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		Wow, you sure do produce a lot quickly! Well done! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Please do not use any images from Wikicommons, like the one you keep restoring at Ed's Big Wham Bam. Please. Please remain an exceptional newcomer. I do not want to see you become a blocked newcomer. Thank you kindly for your understanding. Just use this link to upload the images. Copy the license info from the Wicked Tuna sample. Don't forget the source where the image came from. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You just uploaded File:Wee 3.jpg at commons. They will block you from editing there. If you add that image to an article, I will block you here. I don't want to have to do that. You are starting to fall into the WP:CIR and WP:IDHT category. Please! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

I've blocked you for 24 hours for persistently adding copyvio images to articles. When your block expires, please make constructive edits. Read the above posts to understand how to add images. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fromage 2004

Hello Lolijij,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fromage 2004 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. RotubirtnoC (talk) 17:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bittles

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Bittles, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thefullwiki.org/The_Bittles.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Bittles

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Bittles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.seriesdb.net/series/21352-the-bittles. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from SpongeBob's Toonville Adventures (TV series). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SpongeBob's Toonville Adventures

The article SpongeBob's Toonville Adventures has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced speculation per WP:CRYSTAL. No mention of it online in WP:Reliable sources. Possible WP:HOAX.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Spongebob's Toonville Adventures, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Johanna^{(talk to me!)} 17:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SpongeBob's Toonville Adventures for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SpongeBob's Toonville Adventures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpongeBob's Toonville Adventures until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 17:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from The Bittles, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 17:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to The Bittles. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 17:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to The Bittles. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 17:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to The Bittles. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. /wiae /tlk 17:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to The Bittles. /wiae /tlk 17:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. SwisterTwister talk 18:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Steven Joel Kerzner

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Steven Joel Kerzner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McGeddon (talk) 20:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Adventures of Ed the Sock

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Adventures of Ed the Sock, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Adventures of Ed the Sock

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Adventures of Ed the Sock, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 20:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ripe TV Junior

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ripe TV Junior, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why you are getting many of these messages

Hi, I wanted to let you know why you are getting so many of these messages. It is because you are removing the CSD templates from articles you have created, which you are not supposed to do. See WP:CSD, where it says "The creator of a page may not remove a speedy deletion tag". You've already been warned about this multiple times and yet you've continued to do so. Please stop removing such templates. If you'd like to contest a deletion, the proper procedure is to go to the article's talk page and leave a message there explaining why you think the article shouldn't be speedily deleted. Thanks, /wiae /tlk 20:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spongebob's Toonville Adventures

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Spongebob's Toonville Adventures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 20:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Spongebob's Toonville Adventures, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Farzzle's World

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Farzzle's World, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://dictionary.sensagent.com/farzzle%20s%20world/en-en/.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Farzzle's World

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Farzzle's World requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.telefilm.ca/en/catalogues/production/farzzle-s-world. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. /wiae /tlk 21:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for Persistent disruptive editing, including copyright infringements, creating hoax articles, and continually removing speedy deletion tags from articles you have created, despite numerous messages pointing out to you that doing so is unacceptable. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Fromage 2004, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not revert the page back before discussing this on the talk page. In addition, there is no sources to verify that this is released in conjunction with PBS Kids or Barney. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ⁓ Hello 71 18:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lioyd Banks listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lioyd Banks. Since you had some involvement with the Lioyd Banks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. /wiae /tlk 18:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Fromage 2004. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Katie^talk 18:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your last chance

Lolijij, please. Communicate with us. Please see what is happening. Wikipedia functions by all of us working together. You must not simply force your will here. As you are smart enough to make articles, you must also be smart enough to see where this is going. Next time you will probably be blocked indefinitely. I have tried to help. I've even given you an award to be encouraging. Please, no more uploading copyrighted images. No more reverting against community wishes. Try to work together. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SpongeBob's Toonville Adventures (TV series)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as SpongeBob's Toonville Adventures (TV series), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crow^Caw 22:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at SpongeBob's Toonville Adventures (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. /wiae /tlk 23:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gary the Snail. Qpalzmmzlapq | talk | contribs 23:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not recreate SpongeBob's Toonville Adventures (TV series) or add it to any other article unless you provide multiple reliable sources that show that the show exists and will air on the named networks. If you recreate the page again without doing so, I'll assume your intent is to disrupt the encyclopedia by creating hoaxes. —C.Fred (talk) 03:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ripe TV Junior

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ripe TV Junior, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. /wiae /tlk 02:33, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mkdw ^talk 05:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ed's Big Wham Bam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ed's Big Wham Bam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed's Big Wham Bam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 03:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fromage 2004 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fromage 2004 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fromage 2004 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 03:38, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Twirlywoos

Hello, Lolijij,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Twirlywoos for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 00:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Twirlywoos

Hello, Lolijij,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Kochas, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Twirlywoos, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kochas}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Kochas 01:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]