User talk:Luketense

Indian Journals, Mindfields[edit]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Indian Journals, Mindfields. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Corvus cornix 20:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mindfields (journal)[edit]

I moved your post from this talk page to your user space at User:Lukehaokip/Mindfields (journal) draft since it seemed more like advertising than talk page material. If you desire to start a Mindfields (journal) article, click on Mindfields (journal) and post your information. Before you do, I suggest adding reliable source references to the draft article that are independent of the Mindfields journal. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 23:38, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajesh Kamat (October 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JustBerry was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajesh Kamat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JustBerry (talk) 12:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Lukehaokip, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JustBerry (talk) 12:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajesh Kamat (November 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

Presuming that this person is notable, there is much in this article that is trivial and does not support notability, nor does it add to the article. Being a management trainee isn't encyclopedic. I don't fully understand the meaning of the Endemol India section - I don't understand what his position and role was. Remember that this is not a news article but something longer term, so you cannot say "His current position..." and it may not make sense to list his investments in detail, because that info is going to change. Don't go too far afield from your main subject - saying that TB-L is on the board of a startup he invested in does not provide him with notability, and comes across as promotional. Be careful about inferring actions that are not directly attributable to him: "Within 18 months of CA Media’s investment, OML saw an over 5-fold increase in its revenues." That is undoubtedly true, but unless you find a source that says it was because of his actions, it isn't really relevant for the article. All in all, this article could be much shorter and support notability better.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajesh Kamat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 21:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajesh Kamat (December 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft is inconsistent as to how it refers to its subject. Is he "Rajesh Kamat", which is probably his legal true name, or "Rajesh" or "Kamat"? Referring to him by his first name is too familiar. I have not reviewed this article in full detail and am not saying that resolving the name issue will result in its acceptance, but its inconsistency as to name is not acceptable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajesh Kamat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rajesh Kamat has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rajesh Kamat. Thanks! Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:02, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajesh Kamat has been accepted[edit]

Rajesh Kamat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Poonam Soni[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Poonam Soni, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:15, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Poonam Soni. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Nihlus 20:49, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Basic-logo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Basic-logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:45, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Cosmos-Maya[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Cosmos-Maya, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180110006367/en/KKR-backed-Emerald-Media-Acquires-Controlling-Stake-Cosmos-Maya https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/business-wire/kkrbacked-emerald-media-acquires-controlling-stake-in-cosmosmaya/article10025116.ece https://www.greatandhra.com/articles/special-articles/yupptv-ventures-into-kids-entertainment-wowkidz-89097.html https://www.behindwoods.com/tamil-movies-cinema-news-16/yupptv-ventures-into-the-kids-entertainment-space.html https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/warner-india-release-ramayana-27808, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Cosmos-Maya and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Cosmos-Maya, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Cosmos-Maya. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Cosmos-Maya with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Cosmos-Maya saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:06, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers. As suggested, I have posted a new version of the article (albeit the section names and references remain the same) and posted it at this temporary page and also left a note at Talk:Cosmos-Maya saying I've done so.

Lukehaokip (talk) 21:15, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Either I or (preferably) someone else will look at that in due course – there's quite a backlog! Meanwhile, I've also blanked and listed Rajesh Kamat, as there seem to be a number of copyright infringements there too. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:33, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, Justlettersandnumbers. Is there anything else that can be done instead of blanking the page because it takes a while before someone looks it and restores the page. Thanks 103.42.74.200 (talk) 17:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, Justlettersandnumbers. Is there anything else that can be done instead of blanking the page because it takes a while before someone looks it up and restores the page. Thanks Lukehaokip (talk) 17:26, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:59, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]