User talk:MCNational

April 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 15:20, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MCNational, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 15:26, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ilinden–Preobrazhenie Uprising. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 15:38, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you.Jingiby (talk) 15:49, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Jingiby (talk) 16:09, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 - II

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Yane Sandanski have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Yane Sandanski was changed by MCNational (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.983938 on 2021-04-22T22:59:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:59, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ilinden–Preobrazhenie Uprising. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ilinden–Preobrazhenie Uprising was changed by MCNational (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.977501 on 2021-04-22T23:02:41+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:02, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you.Jingiby (talk) 02:40, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to History of the Jews in North Macedonia have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: History of the Jews in North Macedonia was changed by MCNational (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869447 on 2021-06-26T07:10:10+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 14:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 14:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 15:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Jingiby (talk) 16:42, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jingiby (talk) 07:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:17, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October-II 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mihailo Apostolski have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mihailo Apostolski was changed by MCNational (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969848 on 2021-10-29T02:55:51+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:55, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.Jingiby (talk) 05:22, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue to harass other editors, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 05:21, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Mihailo Apostolski. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:26, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello, I'm Jingiby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Krste Misirkov have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 20:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization ‎. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.Jingiby (talk) 20:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

This edit to White pride did not seem constructive. Your edit summary was not helpful or meaningful. In the future, please provide better summaries. Unconstructive editing may get you blocked from editing in the future. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 02:20, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. In particular, see your edits at Mihailo Apostolski. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that.₨If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 02:25, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 02:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 04:11, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 06:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]