Jump to content

User talk:Malchick79

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!


Hello, Malchick79, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck or looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Help Desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing!

If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page!

Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages:

Best of luck to you, and happy editing!

Luna Santin 10:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Aceviswiki.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Aceviswiki.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:04, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Ace and Vis[edit]

I notice that you've worked hard on the Ace and Vis page. Your link to Chris Brown points to a disambiguation page. I think it would improve the Ace and Vis page if it pointed directly to the page for the correct Chris Brown. If it is Chris Brown the R&B/Pop singer, you can change the link from [[Chris Brown]] to [[Chris Brown (singer)|Chris Brown]] and the Ace and Vis page will look the same, but when someone clicks on Chris Brown, they'll go to Chris Brown (singer).

I hope this helps. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on my Talk page (or use the directions above for immediate assistance). BigrTex 19:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"cheshire street"[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page "cheshire street". Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. See the existing article Cheshire Street. NawlinWiki 15:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly notice![edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- KirinX 16:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eio clothing[edit]

The article Eio clothing has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 01:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Xtrabass1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Xtrabass1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Malchick79! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 903 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. G Money - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Seani B - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. DJ Ayesha - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Robbo Ranx - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alex Jordan (disc jockey) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. The only significant production related to this person is 'International Sounds Of Soca', which does not appear to be notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mz7 (talk) 19:50, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ace and Vis for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ace and Vis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ace and Vis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 23:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]