User talk:Marcomgirl
Welcome[edit]
|
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Serra Project, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.serraproject.org/html/faqs.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Serra Project[edit]
A tag has been placed on Serra Project requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 01:12, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
December 2009[edit]
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Serra Project. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Serra Ancillary Care Corporation[edit]
A tag has been placed on Serra Ancillary Care Corporation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 01:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
March 2010[edit]
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Serra Ancillary Care Corporation. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 02:03, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Serra Ancillary Care Corporation. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Zhang He (talk) 04:13, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Poe[edit]
Hi! There are a ton, a ton, of references on your new article. The magazine references are all very reliable, so you don't appear to have any notability problems. But you also have a whole lot of references to blog-type webpages, not so reliable, which will most likely slide unless someone challenges their accuracy. You appear to have made the same mistake I made when I first started editing on Wikipedia. The apostrophe like symbols that you use to get bold or Italics is not actually on the standard keyboard. It is in the symbol list in Windows, but that is next to impossible to easily use. Just use the tabs for them at the top of the edit page. It would be a good thing if your article had an infobox. I will add a tag for the musician workgroup of the biography project and note the need for an infobox and photograph. Good work. Someone will probably come along soon and tag the article as needing copyediting, but that is the beauty of the project! Then someone will do the copyediting! Happy editing; I for one, are glad you are a Wikipedian! Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:26, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Edit conflict[edit]
Hi, I was starting to clean up the references; I will stop now and doing some breakfast. Please check your latest ~6 edits and do them again please. I simply have corrected to many stuff (semi automatic with different tools) to get your changes into my edits again. mabdul 11:23, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oh and I missed: please respect next time the template {{in use}} to avoid edit conflicts. mabdul 11:30, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thank you Mabdul[edit]
Appreciate your assist on references / ibid. Made more editorial changes, but kept your edits. Marcomgirl
Marcomgirl (talk) 11:35, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
A kitten for you![edit]
Nice job on that Poe article! Looks amazing! Angry psychos forever.
Alpheta (talk) 10:32, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 10[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moira Fitzpatrick, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Washington State, La Mesa and Wellness. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Moira Fitzpatrick for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moira Fitzpatrick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moira Fitzpatrick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ireneshih (talk) 06:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 7[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Poe (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vogue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (Oksana Kolesnikova) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Oksana Kolesnikova, Marcomgirl!
Wikipedia editor UNSC Luke 1021 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Pretty good. Strongly suggest you improve on this article in the near future.
To reply, leave a comment on UNSC Luke 1021's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Marcomgirl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Marcomgirl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Oksana Kolesnikova[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Oksana Kolesnikova, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 05:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mimi Guarneri[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mimi Guarneri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Uncle Roy (talk) 20:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Sheryl Nields[edit]
Hello. Do you have a professional connection with Sheryl Nields? Can you please have a read of WP:PAID? Thanks, Uncle Roy (talk) 13:18, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Uncle Roy. Yes thank you for your help! This is my first paid posting. I will add the necessary {{PAID}} tags and thoroughly read the recommended section. I hoped someone was tuned in to my work as I want to be sure it completely meets all criteria, especially regarding no promotional language. MarcomgirlMarcomgirl (talk) 13:51, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Please make sure that this is properly disclosed per WP:COIDISCLOSEPAY: I note that the talk page still does not indicate the COI. Thanks. Innisfree987 (talk) 03:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Sheryl Nields[edit]
.svg) | This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Sheryl Nields for their contributions to Sheryl Nields. |
Marcomgirl (talk) 13:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Sheryl Nields employed me to create the initial Sheryl Nields page.
Help: Following the "peacock" promotional language warning, I streamlined and reworded her content to fully adhere to content rules. I would appreciate a review of the page and removal of the "peacock" notation - or let me know what might continue to warrant that label. I am most appreciative of any assistance. Thank you.Marcomgirl (talk)
Indexing[edit]
"Marcom (sometimes spelled "marcomm") is an abbreviation for "marketing communications." Marcom is targeted interaction with customers and prospects using one or more media, such as direct mail, newspapers and magazines, television, radio, billboards, telemarketing, and the Internet."
Marcomgirl, as you are a (correctly) declared paid editor, and as your major concern is that the articles you create be indexed for search engines, it is clear that promotional use of Wkipedia for your clients is your goal. I am more inclined to block your account and delete all the articles you have submitted. It's unlikely you will get much free help from our hard-working unpaid volunteers. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:04, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 05:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
see content removed and content challanged sections DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 05:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Sheryl Nields for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheryl Nields is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheryl Nields until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Maproom (talk) 08:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Signature Creative[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Signature Creative, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Jeffrey Drew has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No reliable sources. No in-depth coverage ( mostly only cast and credit listings). A plethora of such sources does not add up to notability per WP:CREATIVE or WP:NACTOR.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Best in Drag Show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Largely duplicates Battle for the Tiara. Failed merge proposal.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:24, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Terms of use[edit]
Hi, while I thank you for declaring your affiliation with Sheryl Nields, I want to point out that the terms of use require that you declare for every article that you work on now and in the future where you have been paid. This is part of an amendment that was made to the terms of use by the Wikimedia Foundation in 2014. Please also note that simply complying with the terms of use does not guarantee that an article will meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. A guideline that is key to inclusion is WP:N, which also includes the key policy WP:NOT. If you have not already read our guideline on conflicts of interest, I would encourage you to do so as well. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:03, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
I appreciate your ensuring that I know the requirements for labeling mg work when paid. Almost everything I ever edited was as a volunteer passionate about my subjects and feeling a great sense ic belonging to a larger ckmmhnity. I suppose if was foolish of me years ago to create a user name as marcomgirl. The discussion about my work, my intentions and gaming the system and only promoting topics for financial gain from paid clients is far ftkncthe truth. I have sat back in paralysis as my contributions for many years were posted for deletion based on a clear double standard as well as mean spirited and with a veiled mysogenistic attitude - that editor can be clearly identified by his posts. This paid request for Sheryl Nields seemed appropriate and I felt that complying as a paid editor would keep me honored for my integrity. I am sure many editors are paid and do not disclose. I am applalled at the clear infighting among editors and with one's intention to block me, I simply do not want to be a part if such an ugly energy. His assumptions are wrong. Marcomgirl (talk) 22:09, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Marcomgirl. I am very sorry for the negative experience you are having on Wikipedia. One point that may be of some help regards the fact that many of Wikipedia's policies have changed since your original creations back in 2009. It's now the case that topics require a lot more coverage by independent reliable secondary sources in order to be permitted an entry in the encyclopedia--i.e. outside media needs to have written about them to establish they are "notable". If you can find and add such sources to those entries, it will go a long way to keeping them from being deleted. Hope that helps. Innisfree987 (talk) 23:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- To be clear: this was not a threat. I intentionally worded it neutrally and to be informational. I have expressed my views as to how WP:NOT applies at the AfD, which I feel is the appropriate forum for that discussion, not here. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:37, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- Oops I think TonyBallioni and I just editconflicted each other--I was just about to say likewise that you can find some good information on eligibility/notability at the link Tony mentioned above, WP:N. Thanks both. Innisfree987 (talk) 23:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- To be clear: this was not a threat. I intentionally worded it neutrally and to be informational. I have expressed my views as to how WP:NOT applies at the AfD, which I feel is the appropriate forum for that discussion, not here. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:37, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Marcomgirl. I am very sorry for the negative experience you are having on Wikipedia. One point that may be of some help regards the fact that many of Wikipedia's policies have changed since your original creations back in 2009. It's now the case that topics require a lot more coverage by independent reliable secondary sources in order to be permitted an entry in the encyclopedia--i.e. outside media needs to have written about them to establish they are "notable". If you can find and add such sources to those entries, it will go a long way to keeping them from being deleted. Hope that helps. Innisfree987 (talk) 23:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Jeffrey Drew for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeffrey Drew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Drew until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Winged Blades Godric 06:52, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Fred Earl Norris Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winged Blades Godric 06:54, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Aid for AIDS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Typical promotion.Fails WP:GNG.Non-notable organisation.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winged Blades Godric 06:55, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of The Serra Project for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Serra Project is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Serra Project until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:24, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Oksana Kolesnikova for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oksana Kolesnikova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oksana Kolesnikova until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 14:14, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of John Gheur for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Gheur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Gheur until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:39, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Marcomgirl. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)