User talk:Marjoriemassah

August 2019

Hello, I'm Whispering. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jenny's Journeys have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Whispering^(t) 15:44, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Summer Madness (song). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Whispering^(t) 15:44, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Micheal Yekha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Micheal Yekha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VViking_TalkEdits 13:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Micheal Yekha

Hello, Marjoriemassah,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bensci54 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Micheal Yekha, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bensci54}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Micheal Yekha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Micheal Yekha, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:23, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Micheal Yekha concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Micheal Yekha, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Micheal Yekha

Hello, Marjoriemassah. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Micheal Yekha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 20:24, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Micheal Yekha.pdf

The file File:Micheal Yekha.pdf has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused plaintext PDF, encyclopedic biographical information should be in an article and not a PDF, we are not a WP:WEBHOST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 03:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vuyo Mokoena

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vuyo Mokoena, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Grabup (talk) 14:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pasting from article talk page, in case it is deleted.

Your article must be fully cited with footnotes to reliable sources when it is created in the main article space, to show that this person meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. As you can see, failing to demonstrate notability means that the article is at risk for deletion.

Many of the sources you have listed are not reliable. Any website consisting of user-generated content lacks the editorial oversight we require from sources, and is therefore disqualified. This means sites like Discogs and Last.fm are considered unreliable; as are online retailers like Amazon and Apple Music. Your Allmusic source is just a list of songs; without accompanying prose, this can't establish notability. Also, you cited another wiki site that re-uses Wikipedia content. Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source, so you cannot cite it or any other site that re-uses its content.

The Journal of Gospel Music site is a blog, which by definition is a self-published source and therefore unreliable. However, the post does quote a source that might be reliable (Mail & Guardian). Using the Mail & Guardian directly as a source would be acceptable.

Please review these pages for identifying reliable sources:

--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]