User talk:MediaMNG
|
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Love, Sex & Religion, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.sebastiansiegel.com/Site/Indie.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- Please don't remove maintenance tags without addressing their concerns. Content that is closely paraphrased from previously published sources can't be used without first verifying permission. I have revised and removed some content to bring the text within our policies. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:12, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- It seems for some reason these articles are being attacked with bias. Thank you for the neutral and fair editing Moonriddengirl. It seems you have done some a great deal of neutral and well informed contributing work to Wikipedia. (MediaMNG) 10:23 10 July 2010
The article Love, Sex & Religion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not notable without significant coverage in independent reliable sources.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 10:00, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Sebastian Siegel, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:29, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- OK SummerPhD, we've added over 20 links to 3rd party references on the Sebastian Siegel article, do you recommend we delete some of the other references then to his primary site, or leave them? Please send any recommendations, thanks MediaMNG
- Before we get into that, who controls this account? You've identified yourself (in the first person plural: "we") as being "currently" in control of the account. Am I correct in assuming that the account is being used by "Media Management", the production company of the film in question? - SummerPhD (talk) 00:48, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Sebastian Siegel
[edit]
I have nominated Sebastian Siegel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Siegel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 03:34, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Love, Sex & Religion
[edit]I have nominated Love, Sex & Religion, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love, Sex & Religion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 03:37, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MediaMNG for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. SummerPhD (talk) 11:40, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from attempting to discredit this account with unfounded accusations of holding additional accounts and perspectives on this article. Wikipedia is valuable reference tool which you ( SummerPhD ) have done some nice contributing work to. Any other individuals or accounts that have participated in this article are unaffiliated. Thank you (MediaMNG) 10:15 10 July 2010
Your username is the name of a company which has potentially extremely close interests in the article that you are editing
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, MediaMNG, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it Your name is essentially a company name (Media Management) which is the name of a management firm for the articles about which you are editing and participating in deletion discussions.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. Active Banana (talk) 03:25, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
July 2010
[edit]
Why can't I edit Wikipedia?
Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but it is considered inappropriate for such groups to use Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
- Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?
Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organization for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
- What can I do now?
You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
- Add the text
{{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}on your user talk page. - Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
- Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
- This block is also justified on sockpuppetry grounds- see the link above, and that your account is under the control of multiple people, per your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Siegel- Wikipedia accounts are for the use of one person and one person only. Courcelles (talk) 03:07, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
The file File:Sebastian Siegel, Best Buddies.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Promotional image only used in an article that now has full protection on it.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 18:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
