User talk:Michael.C.Wright/Archive 1
Your submission at Articles for creation: S795 coffee (January 24)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:S795 coffee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Michael.C.Wright,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 17:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: S795 coffee (February 26)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:S795 coffee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Welcome!
[edit] A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10... 100... 200
Hello, Michael.C.Wright, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Sam Sailor and I would like to thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun! To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
If you need further help, you can: or even: Alternatively, place
Again, welcome, and happy editing!
This welcome message was sent by -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |
Talkback
[edit]Message added 07:35, 27 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:35, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: S795 coffee has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
-- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:39, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Ways to improve World Coffee Producers Forum
[edit]Hi, I'm AmericanAir88. Michael.C.Wright, thanks for creating World Coffee Producers Forum!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Talk more generally about the organization. Try to avoid bias statements
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
AmericanAir88 (talk) 19:39, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Addressing Issues
[edit]@Michael.C.Wright: Hello, Thank you for taking the time to respond. You cannot believe how many users do not even address issues, so I thank you so much.
Bias statements tend to show when you get deep into a companies history using primary sourcing or conversation like words.
The paragraph "The main focus of the forum was to analyze the challenges faced by the value chain, including "farmers' economic sustainability, productivity, price volatility, the next generation of coffee growers, the consequences of climate change, how to keep the quality and traceability for an every day more and more discerning and informed consumer and an increasing demand of 50 million bags in the next 10 to 15 years, among others." is taken from the organizations website(primary source) and gives off a promotional tone. It sounds like the article is trying to promote the organization.
The 2017 section is important to the article but contains no sourcing. Leave specific events in one section and talk more about what the organization does (while being neutral) and its impact on society.
Check out WP:NOTADVERTISING for more details. If you need any more info, just ask. I am going to help you with this. I am currently editing now.
Thank you AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Michael.C.Wright: Update: I have sourced and expanded the article.
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Important notices
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.