User talk:Milei.vencel

Welcome!

Hello, Milei.vencel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Darwinek (talk) 17:13, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kolkata, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Anbu121 (talk me) 05:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	As much as it hurts me to see slums in my home town, you did very well to capture it on film. For the excellent picture File:Poor part of Chennai.JPG. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Béla Bicsérdy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hungarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Otto Buchinger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of spa towns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gyula

Spa town (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gyula

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The most beautiful villages in Italy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Trevi, Soncino, Scanno, Bova, Opi and Gangi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Most Beautiful Villages in Italy

Hi, somebody seems to have removed, without explanation, much of your input into the above article. I have already reverted but thye have again deleted a lot of content. Can you check? Regards Denisarona (talk) 12:11, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Milei.vencel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Miracle of Fasting

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Miracle of Fasting, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jonnymoon96 (talk) 23:39, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Miracle of Fasting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Miracle of Fasting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Miracle of Fasting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jonnymoon96 (talk) 14:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Milei.vencel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Milei.vencel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dualisztikus kozmológia

Kedves Milei.vencel, köszönöm szépen kedves üzenetedet. Nem merek ígérni még semmi konkrétat, személyes okok (kötözés utáni káosz) miatt, az akkori régi könyveimhez sincs most hozzáférésem. Remélem túl leszek majd ezen a háborús időszakon. Őszinte üdvözlettel, Physis (talk) 08:28, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect map

Various countries where JWs are not present or operate covertly under ban should be shown as grey according to the legend provided in the information for this image, but are instead shown as blue on the map. The list of countries that should be shown as grey are indicated at Jehovah's Witnesses by country#Other. Please fix the map before re-adding it to articles.--Jeffro77 (talk) 09:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffro77, do you think u are so many in the islam countries that you cannot fit in the category dark blue, alias 5000+. Even Western Christians are scarce in these countries, not that of J's W. There are sources beyond the community database.. --Milei.vencel (talk) 10:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no available data. Presuming the data on your own is original research. The countries with unknown numbers should be grey (unknown), as you have already done some for some countries such as China.—Jeffro77 (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can study for example this and think it over: Christianity by country. --Milei.vencel (talk) 10:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you think that supports your position. Countries with no data are shown as unknown. Do the same. Not sure what "community database" you refer to, but the JW sources provide no data for the countries listed at Jehovah's Witnesses by country#Other. If you have other sources, please provide them. It isn't suitable to synthesise data based on separate data for Christian denominations, particularly because it is not clear whether that data includes JWs. Many mainstream denominations do not consider JWs to be 'true' Christians, and whilst that is a pointless distinction in real terms, it does cast doubt on the reliability of the extrapolation you're trying to make.—Jeffro77 (talk) 10:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Jeffro77 (talk) 10:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be so hard to just indicate the countries with no data as unknown?--Jeffro77 (talk) 10:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In many muslim countries are minimal numbers of Christians. But in a new map i will to combine the category of unknown and 5000 +. --Milei.vencel (talk) 11:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It would certainly be an improvement to at least include 'unknown' in that category, though it would be better to properly distinguish the countries where figures are unknown. You cannot be certain that there are any JWs in those countries because there are 37 sovereign states where they don't report specific figures. Out of 196 actual sovereign states, they report activity in 159 specific countries along with collective totals for 33 'other lands' (some of which may be dependencies of other countries). So there are at least 4 countries where they don't acknowledge any activity, and it is not suitable here to speculate about which 4 of 37 those might be. (Hence your selection of countries that you did shade in grey to the exclusion of other unlisted countries is also inappropriate.)--Jeffro77 (talk) 01:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]