User talk:Mir Adil Ali

April 2019

Hello, I'm AhmadLX. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Muawiyah I, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 18:53, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Lutfunnisa Begum

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! M.Bitton (talk) 23:13, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm THEFlint Shrubwood. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tipu Sultan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. THEFlint Shrubwood (talk) 03:42, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Shia to articles

Hi. I notice you've been adding "Shia", without providing sources, to many articles on Wikipedia, and continuing to do so after being repeated. Please note that this can be viewed as disruptive editing and can lead to your being blocked. I also see that you've edited under the alternative account User:Mir Adil Ali Rizvi. Please familiarize yourself with our policies on legitimate uses of alternate accounts.--regentspark (comment) 17:05, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of Shia dynasties. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. qedk (t 桜 c) 11:47, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tipu Sultan. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 11:50, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tipu Sultan. PATH SLOPU 11:54, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:56, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Mir_Adil_Ali reported by User:Girth Summit (Result: ). Thank you. GirthSummit _(blether) 11:42, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]