User talk:Musenene farahat

Welcome!

Hello, Musenene farahat, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 15:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the warm welcome. Musenene farahat (talk) 16:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joshua Baraka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joshua Baraka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Baraka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 15:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alien Skin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alien Skin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien Skin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 19:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Omar AlSayed Omar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Omar AlSayed Omar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources to show notability and to support the statements made. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kleuske (talk) 11:25, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The article that you moved to draft was still under creation. I have cited it more, categorized it and submitted the draft for review. Could you take a look at it? Thank you. Musenene farahat (talk) 12:12, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Omar AlSayed Omar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Omar AlSayed Omar. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Waiswa Mufumbiro moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Alex Waiswa Mufumbiro. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 13:35, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Alex Waiswa Mufumbiro. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:28, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:KibangaWiki per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KibangaWiki. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 13:51, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Musenene farahat (talk) 06:57, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Musenene farahat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I understand that I have been blocked for alleged "Socket puppetry" that is linking me to another user account. I am writing to appeal the block because this is a misunderstanding, that could have risen from sharing a device with another Wikipedia user. I created my account in 2016 making it an 8 years old account, and I only started editing pages recently when I learnt the key rules and guidelines of the platform. I ask that this appeal is considered and my account is reinstated with my edits. I look forward to a reply and possibly an engagements if needed. Sincere regards

Decline reason:

This does not address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KibangaWiki/Archive. Yamla (talk) 20:20, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Musenene farahat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have gone through the socket puppet investigations about a User KibangaWiki and I have seen that there is an entanglement in the edit history with my account or rather a conflict on interest. I recreated some pages that have been previously created by that user. The conflict arose probably because I have shared a device and created interests and this person inspired me to become a regular editor with my long held a created account. I recreated these pages with no knowledge that this is not allowed by Wikipedia and I hope we can come to a helpful discussion of finding possible solutions. Please advise on what I can do to solve this. Musenene farahat (talk) 06:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So you recreated the same articles at random? I don't believe that. In any event, your only pathway forward now is the standard offer; come back in six months without edits and socking. 331dot (talk) 06:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Musenene farahat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not say that I recreated pages randomly by mistake. I was asked by that User to recreate pages for them and this was only done because I thought that recreating pages is not against the rules of the platform. If recreating pages is against the rules then I am on the wrong side of the law but if my offence is contacting another user and using a similar device then I can confirm that that is not true and I ask that my appeal is dealt with. Thank you Musenene farahat (talk) 10:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't have laws on Wikipedia because we are not a government. We have policies and guidelines, and if users do not follow them than they are blocked. The unblock request shows me that the user does not understand WP:MEAT and thus should not be unblocked. Z1720 (talk) 20:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom for proper flow. The Reply function is not designed to accommodate unblock requests well; please edit this page by opening the edit window directly. 331dot (talk) 12:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"I was asked by that User to recreate pages for them" This is sockpuppetry. --Yamla (talk) 12:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]