User talk:MushtumAzho
|
July 2010[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Adolat has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/pages/Uzbeks-of-Kyrgyzstan/126259537412507?ref=ts.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:44, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page The analyzes of the event by Osh Experts do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://azhokg.blogspot.com/2010/07/there-was-not-genocide-in-kyrgyzstan.html. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:21, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
![Warning](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/57/Circle-style-warning.svg/30px-Circle-style-warning.svg.png)
Please do not make personal attacks as you did at The analyzes of the event by Osh Experts. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 2010 Kyrgyzstan crisis. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Your proposed papers on the Kyrgyz situation[edit]
Your article, which I have deleted as an attack page, said that you plan to publish more papers and that "The aim is to prove that in our country Kyrgyzstan, there hasn’t been genocide or such actions towards any minority ethnic groups including Uzbeks." I must tell you that Wikipedia is not the place for articles like that: it is an encyclopedia, not a forum for the expression of political views or polemic. Wikipedia is not for advocacy or for the promotion of any particular point of view. We do not publish original research: everything contributed here must be verifiable from reliable published sources - blogs do not count as reliable - and must be written from a neutral point of view. There are many websites where you could publish your proposed papers, but Wikipedia is not one of them. JohnCD (talk) 16:26, 30 July 2010 (UTC)