User talk:NAB1997

NAB1997, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi NAB1997! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Randolph, New Jersey, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. This image doesn't exist. Please upload it before adding it again. Rdp060707 (Talk and my fight.) 04:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Morris Township, New Jersey, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 13:14, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained removal of sourced content

As you've done before this edit removed sourced details about the percentage of households earning more than $200,000 per year. Why are you removing this material? Alansohn (talk) 20:33, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing this material due to it being unnecessary to display. The income is enough whereas the percentage of income being earned is not needed for display. NAB1997 (talk) 21:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this information "not needed for display"? Alansohn (talk) 13:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NABFNJ. Thank you. Heart ^(talk) 13:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:NABFNJ per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NABFNJ. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NAB1997 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Under the circumstances I am aware of why I have been blocked and accused of being a Sockpuppet I can assure you that my only intention is to be able to add more content or attempt to consolidate and organize content on various wikipedia pages. With that said as I am going along and understanding more and more about the way in which I am expected to behave when using Wikipedia as an editor. I am not sure as to how I will be able to attempt to receive your full approval to remove my block but I can assure having ended up in this predicament again I truly will do my best to not have to be put into block mode. Again, I am only seeking to add more information and content and I always attempt to properly cite my sources. I understand the severity of copyright and how I as an editor must be responsible with the information I add and how I add it. Moreover, please give me the opportunity to be unblocked. I truly enjoy this site and only wish to improve and add more information to make it an even better experience for both myself and other users.NAB1997 (talk) 04:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

By evading your block, you've demonstrated that you cannot be trusted. Your best bet now is to go at least six months with zero edits, then sign in to your original account and request an unblock under the terms of WP:SO. You will need to address your persistent disruptive editing and edit warring, along with your block evasion here. Given that you've gone out of your way to demonstrate you are unwilling to abide by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, an unblock is not guaranteed but this is your best option. Yamla (talk) 10:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.