User talk:Neorge

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello Neorge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Image1poly.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Image1poly.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Image1poly.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Image1poly.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Image1poly.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Image1poly.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Mel hop.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Mel hop.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 20:20, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:422590641 1f686dc580.jpg

You uploaded File:422590641 1f686dc580.jpg and said it was yours and it was public domain. It's not - It belongs to Caribb and is http://www.flickr.com/photos/caribb/422590641/ CC-No Derivatives-Noncommercial - We cannot use a photo with that license. Please do not upload copyright violations.

However I asked the author to relicense the file so I can upload it to the commons. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image is now uploaded here: File:ACA321DorvalAirport.jpg - Its author and info are there. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:51, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:800-turcot.jpg - Where did you get this one from? WhisperToMe (talk) 05:52, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I found http://www.mtq.gouv.qc.ca/portal/page/portal/Librairie/Images/Fr/regions/montreal/turcot/viaduc.gif - You did not create this yourself. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:53, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.mtq.gouv.qc.ca/portal/page/portal/accueil = The content from the site is copyrighted
I found File:23208533040bf57a09b3ig.jpg at http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=240778 - I don't think it belongs to you either
File:151-cartier.JPG is from http://www.amt.qc.ca/grandsprojets/metrolaval/photos/photos.asp?chemin=cartier - Copyvio
Stop uploading copyrighted works and saying they belong to you - See Wikipedia:Copyrights - You can be blocked for continuing to violate copyright. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:06, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Expo 17

I have nominated Expo 17, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expo 17. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ash (talk) 10:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:18_to_Life.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:18_to_Life.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 01:52, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Altirude montreal persp.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Altirude montreal persp.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Altirude montreal persp.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Altirude montreal persp.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 15:02, 11 September 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:02, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Incendies (film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Incendies (film), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://m.tribute.ca/Movie/Details/22274.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:18, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Incendies.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Incendies.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to The Shawshank Redemption. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 16:12, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of the 10 largest metropolitan areas in Canada by 2031

The article List of the 10 largest metropolitan areas in Canada by 2031 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per Wikipedia:SPECULATION#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball - this article is speculation on future events, and can not be verified.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eclipsed (talk) (code of ethics) 19:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I've added my full 2 cents on the talk page of the article in question, but I thought I'd just comment here, too, so that you get that cool "You have new messages" box when you next log in. I would be happy to discuss this further if I haven't been clear about why I support the deletion, or if you think that my reasons are silly. Cheers, AshleyMorton (talk) 19:57, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Hilton garden inn.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hilton garden inn.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:22, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Extension Dorval - Loop ligne orange.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Extension Dorval - Loop ligne orange.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:55, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Coldplay's forthcoming world tour

A tag has been placed on Coldplay's forthcoming world tour, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

the term "Coldplay's forthcoming world tour" is time-sensitive

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. smileguy91^talk 02:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Coldplay's forthcoming world tour listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Coldplay's forthcoming world tour. Since you had some involvement with the Coldplay's forthcoming world tour redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 07:26, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:620071664 bb619a4973 b.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:620071664 bb619a4973 b.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Silverpuppeteer (talk) 17:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 October 24#OTRS pending since February. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:15, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Hilton.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hilton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Extension Dorval - Loop ligne orange.JPG

The file File:Extension Dorval - Loop ligne orange.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:55, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Metro Montreals.png

The file File:Metro Montreals.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]