User talk:Neuroscientist104

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Neuroscientist104! Thank you for your contributions. I am Way2veers and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Way2veers 20:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dopamine

Hi, thanks for your edits. I've been reworking this article for a while, but I'm not really a dopamine person, and it's definitely challenging my limitations, so it's great to have contributions from somebody with expertise. I do have a couple of comments though. First, my plan was ultimately to get rid of the "animal studies" section, and integrate the facts that it contains into other sections. If we do have material specifically about animal studies, I think it probably ought to go into a separate "Research" section. Second, I think you might be getting into the weeds a bit too much in the ADHD section. This article is really about dopamine rather than ADHD, and it ought to mention the existence of puzzles without getting bogged down in solving them -- that should be left for the ADHD article. Particularly we should avoid making use of individual primary research studies here -- anything that isn't treated in review papers is probably at the wrong level. Anyway, I welcome your thoughts. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 22:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher H. van Dyck has been accepted

Christopher H. van Dyck, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

scope_creep (talk) 11:08, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dynamic Network Connectivity (DNC)

Hello, Neuroscientist104,

Thanks for creating Dynamic Network Connectivity (DNC)! I edit here too, under the username Willbb234 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Way, way too technical. Wikipedia isn't a club for those with PhDs

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willbb234}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willbb234 (talk) 16:37, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Dynamic Network Connectivity (DNC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Dynamic Network Connectivity (DNC). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Dynamic functional connectivity. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Dynamic functional connectivity. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Willbb234 (talk) 16:38, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello. Your recent edit to Columbia High School (New Jersey) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 20:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And please read WP:MINOR Meters (talk) 20:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jane Michelle Musky

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jane Michelle Musky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 747pilot (talk) 00:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Michelle Musky moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jane Michelle Musky, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In particular, IMDB is not an acceptable source for articles about living persons. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spicy (talk) 00:11, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for this help! Jane Musky is very much deserving of a Wikipedia page, since she is one of the top Production Designers in the film industry. Thank you for letting me know that IMDB is not considered an appropriate reference; I will see if I can find alternative references that document her contributions Neuroscientist104 (talk) 15:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jane Michelle Musky (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Interviews/her comments are not independent so cannot be used to establish notability, some of sources do not mention Musky, others are trivial mentions and some are not reliable (blogs like Gospnews).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jane Michelle Musky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Neuroscientist104! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jane Michelle Musky

Hello, Neuroscientist104. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jane Michelle Musky".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:45, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]