User talk:NewYorkYankeesVersusNewYorkMets09281999
April 2015
[edit]
Hello, I'm Jetstreamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mexico City International Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 01:15, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
[edit]
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to American Airlines. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Citydude1017 (talk) 06:50, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
[edit] Please do not add unreferenced information to the American Airlines articles. Your edits have been reversed until you supply references. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. TheMagikCow (talk) 16:14, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
[edit] Hello, I'm AsceticRose. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to American Airlines Group because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -AsceticRosé 16:22, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Recent edit to America's Next Top Model (cycle 6)
[edit] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, America's Next Top Model (cycle 6), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 07:09, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
March 2017
[edit] Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Linguisttalk|contribs 11:10, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
WikiProject Top Model
[edit]ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, NewYorkYankeesVersusNewYorkMets09281999. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, NewYorkYankeesVersusNewYorkMets09281999. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
February 2019
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars (season 4); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please stop inserting your WP:Original research into the article. Your changes need to be backed up with reliable sources. Other wikis are WP:UGS and are therefore not reliable. Nihlus 19:47, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Original research
[edit]Please stop making unsourced changes to RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars (season 4). Contestants are only listed as HIGH or LOW if they are clearly designated that by the judges. It is not open to your interpretation of how they performed. Nihlus 02:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Mass editing RuPaul's Drag Race season pages
[edit]Please cease your mass editing of season pages of RuPaul's Drag Race. Your edits go against the current consensus and will be reverted. If you continue to edit without taking it to a talk page for community discussion may be seen as disruptive editing or even edit warring. Continuing this behaviour may lead to warnings and possibly a loss or restriction of editing privileges. Brocicle (talk) 00:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
February 2019
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Please stop changing articles en masse when there is an established consensus to how the articles should appear. Nihlus 00:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
March 2019
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at RuPaul's Drag Race (season 11), you may be blocked from editing. Umimmak (talk) 04:05, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bearcat (talk) 18:45, 16 April 2019 (UTC)May 2019
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing on all season pages of RuPaul's Drag Race. Your edits go against a previously agreed consensus and should be discussed via the talk page before adding. Attempts will be promptly reverted until you discuss possible changes and failing to do so may result in a loss of editing privileges for failing to adhere to consensus and disruptive editing. Brocicle (talk) 02:24, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Stop adding names that were removed via consensus at this RfC. I will ask that you be blocked if you continue. Nihlus 15:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
May 2020
[edit]Your recent editing history at RuPaul's Drag Race (season 12) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Woody (talk) 15:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
High/Low/Safe
[edit]Given your involvement in editing the Season 12 article, particularly the High/Low/Safe issue, your involvement in the discussion at the project talk page would be very welcome. Woody (talk) 13:29, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Woody (talk) 10:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Season 12
[edit]Please explain where the consensus was for this edit? Did I miss the discussion on either the talk page or the ongoing discussion on the WikiProject page about this very issue. Woody (talk) 21:33, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Woody:, there is none. It's just continued disruption by NewYorkYankees that has gone on for years. Nihlus 21:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- This edit is not a consensus nor a discussion. I would strongly suggest that you self-revert and gain consensus for your edits before editing the article. As your statement was article specific, it would have been best made on the article talk page. Please sign your talk page posts. Woody (talk) 22:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Final Warning
[edit]You have continued to edit after my request for a comment above so I have no option but to give you a clear final warning: If you continue to edit disruptively and fail to get a consensus for your edits you will be blocked indefinitely. You have been blocked twice for edit warring over the same issue over a period of over a year. There has been no change over that year despite numerous warnings. Wikipedia works by editors reaching a consensus on whether content meets the core content policies. You have continually failed to engage in discussion about content despite numerous requests, edit notices and hidden comments in the article to do so. I repeat: if you continue to make disruptive edits to contentious material without comment or consensus you will be blocked indefinitely. Woody (talk) 07:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- NewYorkYankeesVersusNewYorkMets09281999, where did you obtain consensus to make these edits? [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Nihlus 20:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Blocked indefinitely
[edit]Following my warning above you have continued to edit the RuPaul Drag Race articles to change the status of material that you know is contentious (eg [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]). You have been blocked twice over a period of a year for edit warring over the same issue yet you continue to change their status and edit war without any discussion. Wikipedia works by editors reaching a consensus on whether content meets the core content policies. There is an active discussion over this issue that you have been told about many times yet you have not engaged in. As such:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.If you are able to show that you are able and willing to engage in consensus building and edit IAW Wikipedia's core policies then you may request to be unblocked using the code shown above. Woody (talk) 21:54, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
NewYorkYankeesVersusNewYorkMets09281999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I will no longer make edits on the contestant progress tables for any pages of RuPaul's Drag Race. Therefore, I will not be contributing to the problems that are faced there. I am alright with being monitored over this, but I request to be given a chance for the duration of All Stars 5, so I can prove I can go the whole time without touching the contestants progress table.
Decline reason:
No. I mean, this doesn't even convince me you've read WP:CONSENSUS, let alone convince me you'll always abide by it. Yamla (talk) 01:40, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.