User talk:NickolasGameiro95

Welcome!

Hello, TerrNickterr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to 2017 Belarusian protests. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Yashovardhan (talk) 13:15, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Yashovardhan (talk) 13:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Christian Young (entrepreneur)

Hello, NickolasGameiro95,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Christian Young (entrepreneur) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Young (entrepreneur) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Mduvekot (talk) 14:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam and likely undeclared paid editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Huon (talk) 02:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NickolasGameiro95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yesterday I've asked Huon for a help with my draft via live chat and now I can see he blocked me. I can't see the reason of this block because I didn't know about the previous subject discussion and it is just my first draft sent to review. NickolasGameiro95 (talk) 10:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The draft was only one piece in a much larger pattern. NickolasGameiro95's contributions, live and deleted, show involvement in multiple spamming schemes. If that happens once, it's coincidence. Twice, maybe bad luck. If it happens over and over again, there's more to it. Huon (talk) 01:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NickolasGameiro95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not a paid editor and I'm not trying to cause damage in any way. After Huon sent me link to ITWORX deletion discussion I understand that there were already efforts to create such article and I was surprised that community find it not notable enough. Regarding to "Christian Young" article I still think that the president of FD9 is kind of famous and notable person NickolasGameiro95 (talk) 23:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Even if you are not paid (which I agree with Huon you likely are), you must abide by the English Wikipedia's policies on spamming links and promotion. Huon blocked on that as well as the local terms of use. Right now, you haven't presented to us a reason to unblock for the local policy, and the global terms of use violations are also likely. In order to be unblocked, you must address both. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:46, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'd like to point the reviewing admin particularly towards the State Counsellor of Biafraland link spamming campaign and the involvement in Draft:Ryan Hampton (author) (see also [1]). As I said, once is a coincidence, twice might be bad luck, this is something else. Huon (talk) 00:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Biafraland staff was really a bad idea and I regret for doing it. Ryan Hampton draft I just saw in "recent changes" and sent it to submission!NickolasGameiro95 (talk) 00:49, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:ITWORX

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:ITWORX, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Calton | Talk 13:21, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:24, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]