User talk:Nico4201

Speedy deletion nomination of Cheat codes for nfs prostreet

Hello Nico4201,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cheat codes for nfs prostreet for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blythwood (talk) 17:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your article

I'm sorry to have to mark your article for deletion, but this content isn't right for Wikipedia. My advice is post it on a blog. Blythwood (talk) 17:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Why star wars the force awakens is not a true star wars movie

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Why star wars the force awakens is not a true star wars movie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but Wikipedia isn't a place to record your personal reflections, opinions, etc. It's for impersonal, neutral reference articles about notable topics. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:11, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Why wiki deletes stuff that it doesn't like

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Why wiki deletes stuff that it doesn't like, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Why wiki deletes stuff that it doesn't like. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:35, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Misusing Wikipedia

In response to your note on your user page,

I did have cheats and tips to NFS Prostreet but it got deleted same with why star wars the force awakens is not a true star wars movie and why wiki deletes stuff... If you want to see the articles that they have deleted then go to my sandbox page that I'm still working on.

Wikipedia is not a web host for you to use for your own projects. It isn't a place for blogs, personal essays, anything of that nature. Since any material like that will be removed in short order, it won't be worth your effort. There are plenty of blogging sites, so why not just set up shop on one of them? —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nico4201

A tag has been placed on User:Nico4201 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Re-incred (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Re-incred and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nico4201, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Nico4201 (talk) 17:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

you can't delete my user page that's my description and if you do delete it I WILL re-post it.

After that, having reached the end of your warnings, you'll be blocked, and then it will be deleted again.

Of course it can be deleted. Do you think that the rules here don't apply to you, or that you're the first person to think he can defeat them? —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

f#*k you I can just make another account so you can never stop me! >:-)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Re-incred (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

Did you read my comments from the previous Decline? Just submitting it over and over isn't going to help you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Re-incred and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WHY!!!

I submitted a draft and it got rejected and I don't get it, its like they didn't even read the article.

It's more like, you didn't even read the very clear explanation. Or anything else anyone has written to you. I'm sorry, but Wikipedia is not a place for you to write about your own activities that are unknown to the outside world. Encyclopedias don't generally carry articles about local bands that haven't even gotten off the ground yet. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever the band has released one album and is currently on tour with more albums squeduled and on the way so reconsider please.

Speedy deletion nomination of Re-incred

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Re-incred requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean it isn't important enough! at least tell me the article was written well or something positive.

I'm sorry, but our role here isn't to give personal judgments on the quality of your article. We aren't English composition teachers. Everything about what's "important" enough to have an article on Wikipedia, and how that "importance" (the word we use here is "notability") is determined, can be found at WP:N. The most fundamental question is: Is it something that has already been written about, at length, in reliable sources that are independent of the article's topic? Also, information in an article has to be traceable to reliable sources. It can't be original research, stuff that you know but that can't be verified against external reliable sources. Your own band, written about by you, with information about which I can't find any mention in any web-based sources, doesn't qualify. This isn't a judgment on your band or on the quality of your article about the band, it's about whether this topic meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion.

Getting angry and insulting about this makes as much sense as swearing at Rolling Stone because they haven't written an article about your band, or at some TV music channel because they aren't including your videos in their rotation. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nico4201/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Nico4201/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of I hate wiki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on I hate wiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Olly^{say hi} 18:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will always repost

I have saved almost all my work to my computer so if delete it I will just repost it because you started this war by deleting some of my stuff that were actual articles, but some were not.

This website has rules, and you came in here and decided you didn't care about the rules and were going to do what you want. That makes you the one who "started this war". Start accepting responsibility for the consequences of your own actions. Your defiance is ridiculous. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will make another account and use a different computer in a different location unless you make me an administrator and if you say no then just wait a month you might change your minds. I might also negotiate if you give me a good offer to stop doing this.

(sigh) First of all, you're just evading your block and will land you in even more trouble. Any additional accounts and IPs found to be connected to you will be blocked. Second, you can't just get adminship in a heartbeat. Especially not under the circumstances around you. Adminship only goes to trusted editors that prove they know Wikipedia policy (with a couple of exceptions). Third, you're not gonna get unblocked by threatening to attack Wikipedia in a month. Fourth, we don't HAVE to give you a good offer to stop doing this. The main offer is that you realize what you were doing was WRONG, accept your consequences instead of acting like you're innocent, promise not to repeat the things that got you blocked again, and tell us how you will improve in the future if you DO get unblocked. Quite frankly, if you keep acting this childish, you're not gonna be allowed to use your talk page. :/ Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

seeing that I would have to go through alot of trouble to bug you nerds I have decided to leave you alone. at first this was about making great articles but by the it was also about bugging you people and making you work harder so my final offer is simple unblock me and give me articles to write that meet your expectations and if you say no then you might or might not see me again and I will put this in my book that you won the battle but not the war... bla bla bla, etc. so just think about it and get back with me.

also

shadowspartan23 is not my sockpuppet he is my friend clayton night that got into this because he agreed with me but you don't have to worry about him any more because he forgot his password and didn't give out an email.

the end

well since you havent gotten back with me I guess I will leave you nerds alone... for now.

...

can you please unblock my account now I have left you alone for a while and I regret most of what I did it was not what I should have done, please get back with me soon.

unblock me!

being blocked after this long is just dumb, I don't even care about editing anymore I just don't think that its right to have me blocked for this long. I understand that I did wrong, so please unblock me.

If you don't care about editing, then there's no point in unblocking you, is there? (And I note that you have posted this message two months after you were blocked; that's not so long.) Also, you seem to think that you are entitled to edit here, even after you have created a number of inappropriate articles, vandalized talk pages, threatened to continue using sockpuppet accounts, and demanded to be unblocked AND getting an administrator privilege. I am sorry, but that's not how it works. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, the reason why nobody responded to your unblock requests is that we didn't know about them. You could have used the {{unblock}} template (as per instructions in the block message), which will put your talk page in a dedicated category and an administrator will review your case soon. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]