User talk:Nin26

If you start a post on my talk page, I will reply underneath it so as to keep the discussion organised.

November 2016

Hello, I'm Trivialist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 02:34, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! FuriouslySerene (talk) 16:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Despicable Me 3, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Carniolus (talk) 14:36, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Minions (Despicable Me). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Carniolus (talk) 14:37, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Emojimovie: Express Yourself. Carniolus (talk) 09:35, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Team Fortress 3 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Team Fortress 3. Since you had some involvement with the Team Fortress 3 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The1337gamer (talk) 09:32, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm The1337gamer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Team Fortress 3 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The1337gamer (talk) 09:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been asked numerous times to stop adding unsourced content to articles, yet you continue to do so here, and this edit at Braceface is indistinguishable from vandalism. I just saw the end credits for episode 102 and it looks very clearly like a joint production between Nelvana and Jade Animation (Shenzhen) a Chinese company. Your removal of the information about China, particularly with no discussion, no edit summary, and no new references, makes it look a lot like you're deliberately adding incorrect information to the article. If that's not the case, then when your block expires, 1) please start adding references (see WP:REFB to learn how) and 2) please start discussing things on talk pages and 3) please start leaving clear edit summaries. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JudgeRM. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Nintendo Switch games, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JudgeRM (talk to me) 20:38, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Zombies Ate My Neighbors, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JudgeRM (talk to me) 20:42, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:46, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Despicable Me (franchise), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Carniolus (talk) 15:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Michael Herz (producer). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Carniolus (talk) 15:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked. SummerPhD^v2.0 04:36, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Illuminate (Shawn Mendes album), you may be blocked from editing. Andrew (talk) 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Captain Underpants: The First Epic Movie. Carniolus (talk) 20:31, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanamonde (talk) 09:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jon Watts, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Richiekim (talk) 14:03, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Power Rangers (film). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 10:32, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jacksepticeye, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheDeviantPro (talk) 10:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

This is your fifth block for adding unsourced info to Wikipedia. A number of your edits appear to be deliberate hoaxes as well. You are blocked indefinitely, at least until you identify that you understand what you're doing is wrong, and agree to stop. Otherwise, you will remain blocked. Sergecross73 msg me 12:49, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nin26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18111 was submitted on Apr 23, 2017 17:21:07. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:21, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, this editor's talk page access is not revoked. Nin26 - you can still write on your own talk page. As I thought I made clear above, you can speak to me directly, here, about getting unblocked. You don't need to use UTRS. That being said, no matter who you chose to talk to you, you're going to need a pretty good explanation for why you should be unblocked after 5 blocks for the same thing - not following the most basic Wikipedia principle - adding sources to back your information. I'd also ask, source or no, how you came to the conclusion to make some of the edits you've made, and how you plan on avoid getting a sixth block for the same thing. Sergecross73 msg me 18:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nin26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19180 was submitted on Sep 09, 2017 16:28:20. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nin26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unblock

Decline reason:

Given the UTRS request, I've revoked talk page access. Huon (talk) 19:21, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nin26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20211 was submitted on Jan 02, 2018 04:03:34. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nin26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21435 was submitted on May 06, 2018 06:17:04. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:17, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]