User talk:Norimib

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 07:01, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Juneseechong, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Deb (talk) 17:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Norimib (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have any no reasons to be blocked, this is the 1st time for me to update articles. Please share evidences unless other wise this unfairness still remain.

Decline reason:

You are clearly part of a group of editors intent on promoting GDC Technology Limited contrary to multiple policies and likely the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:42, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Norimib (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How can you prove that I am a part of those basters ? This company is 20 years history contributing to the industry and I am wondering why this becomes a delete scope.

Decline reason:

It's your responsibility to address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Justanotherwikipediauser/Archive. Yamla (talk) 20:55, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Norimib (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

.You guys should take a look at original page, what is an issue this company's info ? No any promotional info., just purely shows its fact, history contributing to the industry. This is my first time to write the article and I am hugely disappointed by this disrespect manner instant without deliberation decline. Thank God, Wikipeida is not for everyone, just for individual those having empower."the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit." is fraud.

Decline reason:

The issue is not about the page. Its about the violation of the sockpuppetry policy, by using multiple accounts in a way which is illegitimate. To be unblocked, you need to address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Justanotherwikipediauser/Archive. I have reviewed the evidence presented there and also conclude that you either used multiple accounts to edit or are working with others to edit. You need to address this before you can be unblocked. I recommend that you read the guide for making unblock requests before you make your next unblock request. If you control these accounts, you will need to request an unblock using the account User:Justanotherwikipediauser. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 00:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Norimib (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I accidentally have created two accounts so that I just have applied this merge as follows. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Username_changes#Simple_rename_requests

Decline reason:

That explanation is insufficient given the evidence presented at the sockpuppet investigation. You're going to need to specifically address the accusations of conflict of interest editing. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Norimib (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no idea what you are talking about. I just create multiple account by accident and I am now modifying, as I believe this is worth explanation.

Decline reason:

First you'd created two accounts by accident, now you've created multiple accounts by accident? I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page to save wasting any more valuable volunteers' time. When you decide to tell the truth, you can make a request at WP:UTRS - but be aware that you can lose the ability to access that too if you abuse the process. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:GDC Technology

Hello, Norimib. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:GDC Technology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:GDC Technology

Hello, Norimib. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "GDC Technology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:38, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]