User talk:Nzgabriel

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Nzgabriel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

I notice that several of your contributions have been marked as needing their improtance explained or rolled back as they do not appear as clear as what was already there. Please do not feel too discouraged. You will learn the standrd expected of us here. Again, welcome. You may like to visit the Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand. --Scott Davis ^Talk 08:34, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikinews

I am also on Wikinews, my talk page can be viewed by clicking here

Your edit to Nzgabriel

Your recent edit to Nzgabriel (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 09:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don Brash

Article names don't usually include titles. I have reverted your move. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies) for more details on the policy - SimonLyall 07:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Year 15?

I see that some New Zealand high school articles say they cater for years 9-15. I thought year 13 was the final year, corresponding to what used to be seventh form. Is there something beyond this, or is the 15 just a typo?-gadfium 03:42, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that year 14-15 is for adults who are returning to school. Nzgabriel 22:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

science link

Linking directly to the experiments sounds great to me. I deleted because I ran straight into products for sale. Did I delete this one twice? If so I apologize. I try to avoid serial deletion/reversion cycles. Keep up the good work. CheersDmccabe

Please stop adding links to the author of the image within the article, it does not add any encylopedic information to the article. This is only required for copyrighted images.--Nunnymus 19:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Waitangi Day

Sorry, at the moment I don't think I'll be going to a marae on the day. I'll let you know if my plans change. -- Avenue 02:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Auckland Meetup 2 Scheduled - Feb 10 2007

Hi. Am not sure where you are in NZ. Hoping you are in Auckland or nearby. Anyway you are invited to Auckland Meetup 2 on the afternoon of Saturday February 10th 2007 at Galbraith's Ale House in Mt Eden. Please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland 2 for details. You can also bookmark Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland to be informed of future NZ meetups. - Linnah 10:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Netconcepts

Hello Nzgabriel. Are you associated with the Netconcepts company? EdJohnston 04:15, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering if I'm a stooge eh? ;-) I'm 16-years-old and a full-time high school student. In my spare time, I write for Wikinews, Wikipedia, and recently, Practical eCommerce. I draw inspiration for what I write about from things I read and watch, people I meet, and generally things that interest me (including e-commerce and search engines). I follow some local (Christchurch) companies including Netconcepts. Sometimes the things I write about get me noticed (I got to know a couple people at Netconcepts because of some of the writing I've done), which is cool when it happens but I'm not here just to network. Don't worry, I always keep a NPOV when I write. :-) Even when it gets me in trouble (like it did here Talk:SLI_Systems). Nzgabriel 08:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I was just slightly alarmed when you edited something on my User Talk page concerning Netconcepts. Generally, per WP:TALK, other users' comments are not corrected. I didn't see anything amiss in your treatment of SLI Systems, by the way. EdJohnston 04:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and sorry I edited your comment. Nzgabriel 04:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You edited my sandbox!

Hi Nzgabriel - I was bemused to find you had edited my sandbox. Hope you won't be offended when I rake it over. I just use my sandbox as an area to try out ideas or accumulate jottings. It's probably a better use of your time to edit real articles ;)

Cheers - Euchiasmus 07:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, sorry. Nzgabriel 08:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Hanes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hanes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:PDMA logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:PDMA logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Sli systems.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Sli systems.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Topbar2 new.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Topbar2 new.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Product Development and Management Association

I have nominated Product Development and Management Association, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Product Development and Management Association. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Guy (Help!) 20:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, are you Gabriel Gorscovoz? Guy (Help!) 20:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- My name is Gabriel Pollard. Nzgabriel (talk) 20:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gabriel. I have never considered you a COI-affected editor. I notice that you are the creator of the PDMA article. It *does* have a serious problem that it is almost entirely sourced to PDMA-generated materials. I wonder if you have any access to more information about PDMA, or if you based your original article-writing on their website? I see that they don't do a very good job of explaining what they actually do. I believe the article can be saved, but some of the criticisms of its current state are valid. Do you have any time to spend improving the article? I do have some ideas. EdJohnston (talk) 21:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do have some time to spend trying to improve this article. What are your ideas, Ed? Nzgabriel (talk) 23:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of C&H Distributors

An editor has nominated C&H Distributors, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C&H Distributors and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Topbar2 new.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Topbar2 new.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Budget Truck Rental logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Budget Truck Rental logo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:24, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Dylan here, wow i didnt realise how much you had been up to since i left and now i have found your page and everything on here. Pretty funny that you didnt get an interview with your own school.If you and the others want to contact me again you could get Pactric to get my cellphone number off his friend "joppy" or josh since it isnt such a good idea to give out your number where anybody can get it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.88.66.242 (talk) 01:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A wikinews article of yours being referred to in an Afd

Courtesy notice. Your article is being mentioned in this Afd. MickMacNee (talk) 16:36, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:HanesBrands.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HanesBrands.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HanesBrands.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HanesBrands.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HanesBrands.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:HanesBrands.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lightbox (New Zealand)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Lightbox (New Zealand), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Lightbox New Zealand. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SLI Systems for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SLI Systems is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SLI Systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PartStore.com for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PartStore.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PartStore.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephan Spencer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SMX. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nzgabriel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nzgabriel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roger Love

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roger Love, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tatupiplu'^talk 10:42, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joe Polish for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Polish is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Polish until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eric Enge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric Enge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Enge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Edwardx (talk) 19:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]